The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XL-5/W2
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-513-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W2-513-2013
22 Jul 2013
 | 22 Jul 2013

COMPARISON OF 3D RECONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION

S. Rasztovits and P. Dorninger

Keywords: SFM, Close-range, Sculpture, 3D Modeling, Accuracy

Abstract. Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) is an established method to reconstruct the geometrical surface of given objects. Current systems allow for fast and efficient determination of 3D models with high accuracy and richness in detail. Alternatively, 3D reconstruction services are using images to reconstruct the surface of an object. While the instrumental expenses for laser scanning systems are high, upcoming free software services as well as open source software packages enable the generation of 3D models using digital consumer cameras. In addition, processing TLS data still requires an experienced user while recent web-services operate completely automatically. An indisputable advantage of image based 3D modeling is its implicit capability for model texturing. However, the achievable accuracy and resolution of the 3D models is lower than those of laser scanning data. Within this contribution, we investigate the results of automated web-services for image based 3D model generation with respect to a TLS reference model. For this, a copper sculpture was acquired using a laser scanner and using image series of different digital cameras. Two different webservices, namely Arc3D and AutoDesk 123D Catch were used to process the image data. The geometric accuracy was compared for the entire model and for some highly structured details. The results are presented and interpreted based on difference models. Finally, an economical comparison of the generation of the models is given considering the interactive and processing time costs.