<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9034</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-7-79-2014</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Raster Vs. Point Cloud LiDAR Data Classification</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>El-Ashmawy</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shaker</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Ryerson University, Civil Engineering Department, Toronto, Canada</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Survey Research Institute, National Water Research Center, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XL-7</volume>
<fpage>79</fpage>
<lpage>83</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2014 N. El-Ashmawy</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XL-7/79/2014/isprs-archives-XL-7-79-2014.html">This article is available from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XL-7/79/2014/isprs-archives-XL-7-79-2014.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XL-7/79/2014/isprs-archives-XL-7-79-2014.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XL-7/79/2014/isprs-archives-XL-7-79-2014.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Airborne Laser Scanning systems with light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology is one of the fast and accurate 3D point data
acquisition techniques. Generating accurate digital terrain and/or surface models (DTM/DSM) is the main application of collecting
LiDAR range data. Recently, LiDAR range and intensity data have been used for land cover classification applications. Data range
and Intensity, (strength of the backscattered signals measured by the LiDAR systems), are affected by the flying height, the ground
elevation, scanning angle and the physical characteristics of the objects surface. These effects may lead to uneven distribution of
point cloud or some gaps that may affect the classification process. Researchers have investigated the conversion of LiDAR range
point data to raster image for terrain modelling. Interpolation techniques have been used to achieve the best representation of
surfaces, and to fill the gaps between the LiDAR footprints. Interpolation methods are also investigated to generate LiDAR range
and intensity image data for land cover classification applications. In this paper, different approach has been followed to classifying
the LiDAR data (range and intensity) for land cover mapping. The methodology relies on the classification of the point cloud data
based on their range and intensity and then converted the classified points into raster image. The gaps in the data are filled based on
the classes of the nearest neighbour. Land cover maps are produced using two approaches using: (a) the conventional raster image
data based on point interpolation; and (b) the proposed point data classification. A study area covering an urban district in Burnaby,
British Colombia, Canada, is selected to compare the results of the two approaches. Five different land cover classes can be
distinguished in that area: buildings, roads and parking areas, trees, low vegetation (grass), and bare soil. The results show that an
improvement of around 10 % in the classification results can be achieved by using the proposed approach.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="5"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>