<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9034</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-329-2016</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>ESTIMATING WOOD VOLUME FOR &lt;i&gt;PINUS BRUTIA&lt;/i&gt; TREES IN FOREST STANDS FROM QUICKBIRD-2 IMAGERY</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patias</surname>
<given-names>Petros</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stournara</surname>
<given-names>Panagiota</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>AUTH, Department of Cadastre, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Laboratory of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Greece</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XLI-B7</volume>
<fpage>329</fpage>
<lpage>334</lpage>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p/>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-329-2016.html">This article is available from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-329-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-329-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-329-2016.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Knowledge of forest parameters, such as wood volume, is required for a sustainable forest management. Collecting such information
in the field is laborious and even not feasible in inaccessible areas. In this study, tree wood volume is estimated utilizing remote
sensing techniques, which can facilitate the extraction of relevant information. The study area is the University Forest of Taxiarchis,
which is located in central Chalkidiki, Northern Greece and covers an area of 58km&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. The tree species under study is the conifer
evergreen species &lt;i&gt;P. brutia&lt;/i&gt; (Calabrian pine). Three plot surfaces of 10m radius were used. VHR Quickbird-2 images are used in
combination with an allometric relationship connecting the Tree Crown with the Diameter at breast height (Dbh), and a volume table
developed for Greece. The overall methodology is based on individual tree crown delineation, based on (a) the marker-controlled
watershed segmentation approach and (b) the GEographic Object-Based Image Analysis approach. The aim of the first approach is to
extract separate segments each of them including a single tree and eventual lower vegetation, shadows, etc. The aim of the second
approach is to detect and remove the “noisy” background. In the application of the first approach, the Blue, Green, Red, Infrared and
PCA-1 bands are tested separately. In the application of the second approach, NDVI and image brightness thresholds are utilized.
The achieved results are evaluated against field plot data. Their observed difference are between -5% to +10%.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="6"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>
