<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9034</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-947-2020</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>DYNAMIC TIME WARPING FOR CROPS MAPPING</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Belgiu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marshall</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stein</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XLIII-B3-2020</volume>
<fpage>947</fpage>
<lpage>951</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2020 M. Belgiu et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIII-B3-2020/947/2020/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-947-2020.html">This article is available from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIII-B3-2020/947/2020/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-947-2020.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIII-B3-2020/947/2020/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-947-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIII-B3-2020/947/2020/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-947-2020.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) has been successfully used for crops mapping due to its capability to achieve good classification results when a reduced number of training samples and irregular satellite image time series is available. Despite its recognized advantages, DTW does not account for the duration and seasonality of crops and local differences when assessing the similarity between two temporal sequences. In this study, we implemented a Weighted Derivative modification of DTW (WDDTW) and compared it with DTW and Time Weighted Dynamic Time Warping (TWDTW) for crops mapping. We show that WDDTW outperformed DTW achieving an overall accuracy of 67 %, whereas DTW obtained an accuracy of 57%. Yet, TWDTW performed better than both methods obtaining an accuracy of 88%.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="5"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>