<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9034</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-273-2026</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Machine Learning for Marine Dock Detection Using LiDAR Intensity and Detectron2</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Steiner</surname>
<given-names>Harald</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ethier</surname>
<given-names>Louise</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pylypenko</surname>
<given-names>Olena</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Geomatics Engineering GeoBC, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, Canada</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>30</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XLIX-B3-2026</volume>
<fpage>273</fpage>
<lpage>280</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2026 Harald Steiner et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIX-B3-2026/273/2026/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-273-2026.html">This article is available from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIX-B3-2026/273/2026/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-273-2026.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIX-B3-2026/273/2026/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-273-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLIX-B3-2026/273/2026/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-273-2026.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The Province of British Columbia is undertaking a multi-year LiDARmapping program to deliver high-quality elevation data and support open-access geospatial products. Although dock detection was not an initial priority, this study demonstrates the value of leveraging LiDAR acquisition programs to support scalable, automated coastal infrastructure mapping. We evaluate the impact of LiDAR intensity normalization on CNN-based marine dock detection using Detectron2. Through a controlled ablation, we compare three strategies&amp;mdash;raw intensity, scan-angle correction, and range-based correction&amp;mdash;to isolate radiometric effects on detection performance. Detection metrics (precision, recall, F-score, IoU) and shape-fidelity measures are reported separately to clarify trade-offs. Results show scan-angle correction delivers balanced precision and recall, while range-based correction improves precision at the cost of recall. Beyond technical findings, this study offers comparative evidence to guide preprocessing choices and provides evidence-based guidance for AI-derived coastal mapping products in British Columbia.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="8"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>