The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Share
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share
Articles | Volume XLIX-B3-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-617-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B3-2026-617-2026
30 Jul 2026
 | 30 Jul 2026

Modelling Wildfire Burn Severity in Canadian Megafires

Eleanore J. Krieger-Pottruff and Sophie L. Wilkinson

Keywords: wildfire, burn severity, Relativized Burn Ratio, Canada, Fire severity mapping

Abstract. Wildfire activity in Canada has increased significantly in recent decades, shifting to larger, more frequent fires and the emergence of megafires (>10,000 ha) across various ecozones. These events typically exhibit complex spatial patterns of burn severity, including larger and more homogeneous patches of high severity. The burn severity patterns and their drivers in megafires remain unclear, in particular, across diverse ecozones. Remote sensing indices such as the Relativized Burn Ratio (RBR) provide an effective means of quantifying burn severity at large spatial scales. This study uses RBR to evaluate nine megafires (each >50,000 ha) representing the 95th percentile and above of fire size within varying ecozones between 2016 and 2022. These fires were used to develop two random forest models: one predicting RBR and another predicting the within-fire z-score of RBR. Within-fire standardization of RBR was conducted to see whether it alters the relative importance of environmental drivers. In the RBR model (OOB R² = 0.75), regional variables such as ecozone and fire ID, along with drought code, were dominant predictors. In contrast, the z-score model (OOB R² = 0.68) emphasized fuel characteristics, including biomass and canopy closure, with additional contributions from elevation and drought-related variables. These results suggest that broad regional and fire-regime controls exert a stronger influence on burn severity than local fuel conditions at the megafire scale. Standardizing burn severity within fires reduces this regional signal but does not improve predictive performance, highlighting the importance of accounting for regional variability in large-fire dynamics.

Share