The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Share
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share
Articles | Volume XLIX-B4-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B4-2026-507-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIX-B4-2026-507-2026
04 Aug 2026
 | 04 Aug 2026

A BIM and LLM Framework for Automated Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Nolan Porther, Amirhossein Nourbakhshrezaei, and Mojgan Jadidi

Keywords: Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW), Building Information Modelling (BIM), Large Language Models (LLM), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), Bayesian Cost Estimation, Circular Economy

Abstract. Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration has become an essential of modern AEC workflows, yet it has failed to gain a position in waste management. This gap is particularly prominent given the urgent environmental and legal imperatives for the sector to mitigate its demolition outputs. Existing approaches to waste classification and diversion cost estimation rely on manual interpretation of project documentation, a process that is both resource-intensive and structurally incompatible with the machine-readable data environments established by Building Information Modelling (BIM). This paper presents a framework that bridges Industry Foundation Class (IFC) compliant BIM data and Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities to automate Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW) classification and probabilistic cost optimisation. The framework utilizes IfcOpenShell to extract element geometry and material data, channeling this information into a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline. To ensure rigorous compliance during classification, a FAISS-indexed knowledge base grounds a locally deployed Llama3 model against the specific mandates of Province of Ontario, Canada regulation 102/94. Diversion cost scenarios are computed through a Bayesian cost module coupled to a multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) optimiser. Th proposed approach is evaluated against a labelled dataset of 104 IFC type-and-material combinations, the RAG classifier. Performance thresholds were established a piori based on multi-class classification benchmarks and Bayesian cost model uncertainty tolerances. The framework achieved a macro-average F1 of 0.84 and overall accuracy of 88%, satisfying the minimum criteria for automated C&DW characterization under Ontario Regulation 102/94.

Share