B

Bakuła, K.

• The Role of Orientation and Calibration in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Preface to the European Calibration and Orientation Workshop - EuroCOW 2025, pages 1–4

Banat, P.

• Open-Source vs. Commercial Photogrammetry: Comparing Accuracy and Efficiency of OpenDroneMap and Agisoft Metashape, pages 65–72

Bedkowski, J.

• Affordable air-ground mobile mapping system for precise forestry applications, pages 5–11
• Method for spherical camera to 3D LiDAR calibration and synchronization with example on Insta360 X4 and LiVOX MID 360, pages 13–19

Berbel, M.

• Combining Galileo’s HAS and the E5 AltBOC signal for terrestrial mobile mapping, pages 21–28

Bettiol, A.

• StereoBaseLine: a flexible system for photogrammetric data acquisition in a linear configuration, pages 29–36

Blázquez, M.

• Combining Galileo’s HAS and the E5 AltBOC signal for terrestrial mobile mapping, pages 21–28

C

Colomina, I.

• Combining Galileo’s HAS and the E5 AltBOC signal for terrestrial mobile mapping, pages 21–28

Cramer, M.

• A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping, pages 115–122

Czarnowicz, M.

• Comparison of DJI Zenmuse L1 and RIEGL miniVUX-3UAV Data for DTM Generation in the Forestry Area for Archaeological Purposes, pages 103–108

D

Daakir, M.

• StereoBaseLine: a flexible system for photogrammetric data acquisition in a linear configuration, pages 29–36

F

Faitli, T.

• A generic multi-lidar data batching strategy on the sensor driver level, pages 37–42

Fanta-Jende, P.

• Perspective-n-Point in Practice: Performance, Robustness, and Accuracy for Mesh-Based Localisation, pages 131–138

G

Gasińska-Kołyszko, E. A.

• The role of echosounder measurement in lidar point cloud calibration, pages 43–48

Gerke, M.

• Perspective-n-Point in Practice: Performance, Robustness, and Accuracy for Mesh-Based Localisation, pages 131–138

Gutjahr, K.

• Calibration and Validation of Phase One Industrial Cameras, pages 73–80

H

Hyyppä, J.

• A generic multi-lidar data batching strategy on the sensor driver level, pages 37–42

Hyyti, H.

• A generic multi-lidar data batching strategy on the sensor driver level, pages 37–42

J

Jacobsen, K.

• Self-Calibration of Fused Camera Images, pages 49–55

Jospin, L. V.

• Quality assessment of Airborne Image Spectrometry Data for the AVIRIS-4, pages 57–63

K

Kaartinen, H.

• A generic multi-lidar data batching strategy on the sensor driver level, pages 37–42

Kostrzewa, A.

• Open-Source vs. Commercial Photogrammetry: Comparing Accuracy and Efficiency of OpenDroneMap and Agisoft Metashape, pages 65–72

Kukko, A.

• A generic multi-lidar data batching strategy on the sensor driver level, pages 37–42

Kulicki, M.

• Affordable air-ground mobile mapping system for precise forestry applications, pages 5–11

L

Ladstädter, R.

• Calibration and Validation of Phase One Industrial Cameras, pages 73–80

Lahaye, J.

• Quality assessment of Airborne Image Spectrometry Data for the AVIRIS-4, pages 57–63

Legat, K.

• Night and Day Aerial Photogrammetry, pages 81–88
• A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping, pages 115–122

M

Majek, K.

• Method for spherical camera to 3D LiDAR calibration and synchronization with example on Insta360 X4 and LiVOX MID 360, pages 13–19

Malek, S.

• Night and Day Aerial Photogrammetry, pages 81–88

Matecki, M.

• Affordable air-ground mobile mapping system for precise forestry applications, pages 5–11
• Method for spherical camera to 3D LiDAR calibration and synchronization with example on Insta360 X4 and LiVOX MID 360, pages 13–19

Meißner, H.

• Assessment of UAV image quality in terms of optical resolution, pages 139–145

Morelli, L.

• Night and Day Aerial Photogrammetry, pages 81–88
• Orientation of ambiguous image sequences with similar and repeated structures, pages 95–102

Muick, M.

• A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping, pages 115–122

N

Núñez-Andrés, M. A.

• Improving the continuous photogrammetric monitoring system, pages 89–94

O

Ostrowski, W.

• The Role of Orientation and Calibration in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Preface to the European Calibration and Orientation Workshop - EuroCOW 2025, pages 1–4
• Comparison of DJI Zenmuse L1 and RIEGL miniVUX-3UAV Data for DTM Generation in the Forestry Area for Archaeological Purposes, pages 103–108
• Assessment of UAV image quality in terms of optical resolution, pages 139–145

P

Perda, G.

• Night and Day Aerial Photogrammetry, pages 81–88
• Orientation of ambiguous image sequences with similar and repeated structures, pages 95–102

Perko, R.

• Calibration and Validation of Phase One Industrial Cameras, pages 73–80

Pełka, M.

• Method for spherical camera to 3D LiDAR calibration and synchronization with example on Insta360 X4 and LiVOX MID 360, pages 13–19

Pfeifer, N.

• Airborne Laser Scanning for Corridor Mapping: Georeferencing with Tightly-coupled Multi-view LiDAR, pages 109–114

Pilarska-Mazurek, M.

• The Role of Orientation and Calibration in Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Preface to the European Calibration and Orientation Workshop - EuroCOW 2025, pages 1–4
• Comparison of DJI Zenmuse L1 and RIEGL miniVUX-3UAV Data for DTM Generation in the Forestry Area for Archaeological Purposes, pages 103–108
• Assessment of UAV image quality in terms of optical resolution, pages 139–145

Prades-Valls, A.

• Improving the continuous photogrammetric monitoring system, pages 89–94

Pöppl, F.

• Airborne Laser Scanning for Corridor Mapping: Georeferencing with Tightly-coupled Multi-view LiDAR, pages 109–114

Płatek-Żak, A.

• Open-Source vs. Commercial Photogrammetry: Comparing Accuracy and Efficiency of OpenDroneMap and Agisoft Metashape, pages 65–72

R

Remondino, F.

• Night and Day Aerial Photogrammetry, pages 81–88
• Orientation of ambiguous image sequences with similar and repeated structures, pages 95–102
• A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping, pages 115–122

Rzonca, A.

• Lidargrammetric co-matching and co-adjustment – a new method of photogrammetric and LiDAR data integration, pages 123–130

S

Sans, G.

• Combining Galileo’s HAS and the E5 AltBOC signal for terrestrial mobile mapping, pages 21–28

Skaloud, J.

• Quality assessment of Airborne Image Spectrometry Data for the AVIRIS-4, pages 57–63

Spitzer, A.

• Airborne Laser Scanning for Corridor Mapping: Georeferencing with Tightly-coupled Multi-view LiDAR, pages 109–114

Stereńczak, K.

• Affordable air-ground mobile mapping system for precise forestry applications, pages 5–11

T

Twardowski, M.

• Lidargrammetric co-matching and co-adjustment – a new method of photogrammetric and LiDAR data integration, pages 123–130

U

Ullrich, A.

• Airborne Laser Scanning for Corridor Mapping: Georeferencing with Tightly-coupled Multi-view LiDAR, pages 109–114

V

Vultaggio, F.

• Perspective-n-Point in Practice: Performance, Robustness, and Accuracy for Mesh-Based Localisation, pages 131–138

W

Wenzel, K.

• A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping, pages 115–122

Wilk, Ł.

• Open-Source vs. Commercial Photogrammetry: Comparing Accuracy and Efficiency of OpenDroneMap and Agisoft Metashape, pages 65–72
• Assessment of UAV image quality in terms of optical resolution, pages 139–145

Woschitz, H.

• Calibration and Validation of Phase One Industrial Cameras, pages 73–80

Z

Zachar, P.

• Comparison of DJI Zenmuse L1 and RIEGL miniVUX-3UAV Data for DTM Generation in the Forestry Area for Archaeological Purposes, pages 103–108
• Assessment of UAV image quality in terms of optical resolution, pages 139–145