<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9034</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W6-2025-91-2025</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Exploring modern end-to-end AI-based multi-view 3D reconstruction</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Goo</surname>
<given-names>June Moh</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9407-5570</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>Zichao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morelli</surname>
<given-names>Luca</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Remondino</surname>
<given-names>Fabio</given-names>
<ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-5342</ext-link>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boehm</surname>
<given-names>Jan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, UK</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>3D Optical Metrology (3DOM) unit, Bruno Kessler Foundation (FBK), Trento, Italy</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XLVIII-1/W6-2025</volume>
<fpage>91</fpage>
<lpage>97</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2025 June Moh Goo et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W6-2025/91/2025/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W6-2025-91-2025.html">This article is available from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W6-2025/91/2025/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W6-2025-91-2025.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W6-2025/91/2025/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W6-2025-91-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLVIII-1-W6-2025/91/2025/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W6-2025-91-2025.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Deriving accurate 3D geometry from multi-view 2D imagery remains a fundamental problem in photogrammetry and computer vision. Conventional pipelines, comprising feature extraction, image matching, bundle adjustment and dense reconstruction, are grounded in well-established geometric principles but remain sensitive to complex scenarios such as significant illumination variability, deficiency in texture and high variability in viewing angles. Recent deep learning developments have triggered a paradigm shift, reformulating multi-view 3D reconstruction as a data-driven, end-to-end optimization problem. Neural architectures now jointly learn feature representations, correspondence estimation and geometric reasoning, supported by large-scale training datasets, high-performance GPU computation, transformer networks and differentiable rendering frameworks. This study methodically examines the transition from traditional photogrammetric approaches to end-to-end AI-based reconstruction pipelines. Using benchmark geomatic datasets, we quantitatively evaluate the performance of two recent and representative end-to-end deep learning methods compared to classical photogrammetry. Results highlight performances of AI-driven approaches in 3D reconstructions and their limits for in large-scale, metric-oriented mapping and modeling applications.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>