<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ISPRS-Archives</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2194-9034</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>ISPRS</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B7-223-2012</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>ACCURACY EVALUATION OF TWO GLOBAL LAND COVER DATA SETS OVER WETLANDS OF CHINA</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Niu</surname>
<given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shan</surname>
<given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gong</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Institute for Global Change Studies Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2012</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>XXXIX-B7</volume>
<fpage>223</fpage>
<lpage>228</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2012 Z. G. Niu et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2012</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XXXIX-B7/223/2012/isprs-archives-XXXIX-B7-223-2012.html">This article is available from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XXXIX-B7/223/2012/isprs-archives-XXXIX-B7-223-2012.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XXXIX-B7/223/2012/isprs-archives-XXXIX-B7-223-2012.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XXXIX-B7/223/2012/isprs-archives-XXXIX-B7-223-2012.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>Although wetlands are well known as one of the most important ecosystems in the world, there are still few global wetland mapping
efforts at present. To evaluate the wetland-related types of data accurately for both the Global Land Cover 2000 (GLC2000) data set
and MODIS land cover data set (MOD12Q1), we used the China wetland map of 2000, which was interpreted manually based on
Landsat TM images, to examine the precision of these global land cover data sets from two aspects (class area accuracy, and spatial
agreement) across China. The results show that the area consistency coefficients of wetland-related types between the two global data
sets and the reference data are 77.27% and 56.85%, respectively. However, the overall accuracy of relevant wetland types from
GLC2000 is only 19.81% based on results of confusion matrix of spatial consistency, and similarly, MOD12Q1 is merely 18.91%.
Furthermore, the accuracy of the peatlands is much lower than that of the water bodies according to the results of per-pixel
comparison. The categories where errors occurred frequently mainly include grasslands, croplands, bare lands and part of woodland
(deciduous coniferous forest, deciduous broadleaf forest and open shrubland). The possible reasons for the low precision of
wetland-related land cover types include (1)the different aims of various products and therefore the inconsistent wetland definitions
in their systems; (2) the coarse spatial resolution of satellite images used in global data; (3) Discrepancies in dates when images were
acquired between the global data set and the reference data. Overall, the unsatisfactory results highlight that more attention should be
paid to the application of these two global data products, especially in wetland-relevant types across China.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="6"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>