FIELD ACCURACY TEST OF RPAS PHOTOGRAMMETRY

40 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas J. Gonçalves & R. Henriques https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.02.009
2. Automated detection of koalas using low-level aerial surveillance and machine learning E. Corcoran et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39917-5
3. Improving the Spatial Accuracy of UAV Platforms Using Direct Georeferencing Methods: An Application for Steep Slopes M. Zeybek et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102700
4. Assessing the effects of external factors on sediment erosion and accumulation in an estuarine environment based on images from unmanned aerial vehicles: Namdaecheon, South Korea S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-021-0011-9
5. Accuracy Analysis of a Dam Model from Drone Surveys E. Ridolfi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081777
6. Clast mobility within boulder beaches over two winters in Galicia, northwestern Spain A. Pérez-Alberti & A. Trenhaile https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.08.001
7. UAV and SfM in Detailed Geomorphological Mapping of Granite Tors: An Example of Starościńskie Skały (Sudetes, SW Poland) M. Kasprzak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1730-8
8. Challenges and Opportunities for UAV-Based Digital Elevation Model Generation for Flood-Risk Management: A Case of Princeville, North Carolina L. Hashemi-Beni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113843
9. Identifying Potential Mosquito Breeding Grounds: Assessing the Efficiency of UAV Technology in Public Health J. Schenkel et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9040091
10. Low-cost UAV surveys of hurricane damage in Dominica: automated processing with co-registration of pre-hurricane imagery for change analysis M. Schaefer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03893-1
11. Drones as a tool to monitor human impacts and vegetation changes in parks and protected areas F. Ancin‐Murguzur et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.127
12. Upscaling UAS Paradigm to UltraLight Aircrafts: A Low-Cost Multi-Sensors System for Large Scale Aerial Photogrammetry N. Latte et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081265
13. Assessing the Accuracy of Underwater Photogrammetry for Archaeology: A Comparison of Structure from Motion Photogrammetry and Real Time Kinematic Survey at the East Key Construction Wreck A. Wright et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110849
14. Remote Sensing-Assisted Stockpile Landslide Monitoring Based on Change Detection Analysis and Identification of Topographical Failure Precursors N. Sadeghi & J. Aubertin https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18152594
15. Accuracy assessment of digital surface models based on a small format action camera in a North-East Hungarian sample area N. Barkóczi & G. Szabó https://doi.org/10.5937/gp21-16076
16. Analysis and Comparison of Lines Obtained from GNSS and UAV for Large-Scale Maps A. Mozas-Calvache & J. Pérez-García https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000215
17. CRBeDaSet: A Benchmark Dataset for High Accuracy Close Range 3D Object Reconstruction G. Gabara & P. Sawicki https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041116
18. Assessing the effectiveness of electromagnetic surveying techniques to determine the extent of buried waste in small trench-and-fill landfills G. McKay et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2026.2729431
19. Enhancing elevation surface precision through comparative analysis of photogrammetric software using UAV data: a case study in Egypt H. Abdel-Maksoud et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-12033-z
20. Deep neural networks based automated extraction of dugong feeding trails from UAV images in the intertidal seagrass beds C. Yamato et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255586
21. Development of a low cost NTRIP-based RTK-GNSS base station for precise positioning S. NJANE https://doi.org/10.37221/eaef.17.2_74
22. Modelling farmland topography for suitable site selection of dam construction using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry O. Ajayi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2018.07.007
23. Evaluating the accuracy of unmanned aerial systems to quantify glacial ice habitats of harbor seals in Alaska C. Pegus et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4287
24. Validation of Regional Positioning Service User Connections as Support in Update Cartography C. Torrecillas et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13293
25. Cooperation between an unmanned aerial vehicle and an unmanned ground vehicle in highly accurate localization of gamma radiation hotspots T. Lazna et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881417750787
26. Cost benefit analysis of survey methods for assessing intertidal sediment disturbance: A bait collection case study S. White et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114386
27. Multi-Variant Accuracy Evaluation of UAV Imaging Surveys: A Case Study on Investment Area G. Gabara & P. Sawicki https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235229
28. Digital topographic mapping and modelling using low altitude unmanned aerial vehicle B. Nwilag et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01677-z
29. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Photogrammetry: Analysis of Orthophoto Images over the Territory of Lithuania J. Suziedelyte Visockiene et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4141037
30. A drone-based method for mapping the coral reefs in the shallow coastal waters – case study: Kish Island, Persian Gulf K. Kabiri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00507-z
31. Towards Automatic UAS-Based Snow-Field Monitoring for Microclimate Research P. Gabrlik et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081945
32. Automatic Microplot Localization Using UAV Images and a Hierarchical Image-Based Optimization Method S. Mardanisamani et al. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9764514
33. Assessment of the Possibility of Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for the Documentation of Hiking Trails in Alpine Areas P. Ćwiąkała et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010081
34. Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing system for UAS photogrammetry P. Gabrlik et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1434331
35. The Impact of Spatial Resolution on the Classification of Vegetation Types in Highly Fragmented Planting Areas Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Images M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010146
36. UAV survey at archaeological earthwork sites in the Brazilian state of Acre, southwestern Amazonia S. Saunaluoma et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1747
37. Integrating structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry into rock weathering field methodologies L. Mol & L. Clarke https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4693
38. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Surveying For Monitoring Road Construction Earthworks K. Julge et al. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2019-14.430
39. Survey of the Ridracoli Dam: UAV–based photogrammetry and traditional topographic techniques in the inspection of vertical structures G. Buffi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1362039
40. Evaluation of camera settings for photogrammetric reconstruction of humanoid phantoms for EBRT bolus and HDR surface brachytherapy applications C. Bridger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-00994-4