AN EVALUATION ON DIFFERENT NUMBER OF GROUND CONTROL POINTS IN UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC BLOCK

46 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Methodology of Processing Single-Strip Blocks of Imagery with Reduction and Optimization Number of Ground Control Points in UAV Photogrammetry M. Lalak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12203336
2. Graphic documentation and digital characterization of the lanterns of the Royal Tobacco Factory in Seville: from laser scanning and photogrammetry to HBIM models M. Chaza Chimeno et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/ege.2026.25853
3. UAV survey method to monitor and analyze geological hazards: the case study of the mud volcano of Villaggio Santa Barbara, Caltanissetta (Sicily) F. Brighenti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2881-2021
4. Accuracy Assessment and Optimization of the Photogrammetric Process Variables for 3D Mapping Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drones) A. Gond et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02126-x
5. Evaluation of Photogrammetry and Inclusion of Control Points: Significance for Infrastructure Monitoring R. Oats et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/data4010042
6. Determination of WGS84 to Adindan datum transformation parameters and its effect for geospatial applications: a case of Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia M. Wondatir & G. Tesfaye https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00491-1
7. Drone methods and educational resources for plant science and agriculture T. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1630162
8. Digital Terrain Models Generated with Low-Cost UAV Photogrammetry: Methodology and Accuracy S. Jiménez-Jiménez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050285
9. Determining optimal photogrammetric adjustment of images obtained from a fixed‐wing UAV K. Pargieła & A. Rzonca https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12377
10. Assessing the Accuracy of Digital Surface Models Derived from Optical Imagery Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Systems S. Manfreda et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3010015
11. High-resolution monitoring of complex coastal morphology changes: cross-efficiency of SfM and TLS-based survey (Vaches-Noires cliffs, Normandy, France) M. Medjkane et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0942-4
12. Droning on: neoichnology in the age of UAV photogrammetry S. Melnyk & B. Harris https://doi.org/10.1080/10420940.2025.2609269
13. Analysis of UAS Flight Altitude and Ground Control Point Parameters on DEM Accuracy along a Complex, Developed Coastline T. Zimmerman et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142305
14. Creation of high-precision digital elevation models using the GNSS UAV A. Gafurov et al. https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-2-27-327-339
15. High-accuracy UAV photogrammetry of ice sheet dynamics with no ground control T. Chudley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-955-2019
16. Variables Influencing the Accuracy of 3D Modeling of Existing Roads Using Consumer Cameras in Aerial Photogrammetry J. González-Quiñones et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113880
17. Influence of quantity, quality, horizontal and vertical distribution of ground control points on the positional accuracy of UAV survey D. D S et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-023-00531-w
18. Accuracy of Photogrammetric UAV-Based Point Clouds under Conditions of Partially-Open Forest Canopy J. Tomaštík et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8050151
19. UAV-based 3D segmentation and structural damage assessment of regional buildings S. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-025-01030-9
20. Determining the Suitable Number of Ground Control Points for UAS Images Georeferencing by Varying Number and Spatial Distribution V. Oniga et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050876
21. Optimization of Number of GCPs and Placement Strategy for UAV-Based Orthophoto Production D. Seo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083163
22. Impact of UAV Photogrammetric Flight and Processing Parameters on Terrain Modelling Accuracy in Ageing Deciduous and Mixed Forests: A SHAP-Based Analysis B. Szász et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics6010017
23. Accuracy of Digital Surface Models and Orthophotos Derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry F. Agüera-Vega et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000206
24. An Improved Ground Control Point Configuration for Digital Surface Model Construction in a Coal Waste Dump Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System H. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101623
25. Geometric and Radiometric Consistency of Parrot Sequoia Multispectral Imagery for Precision Agriculture Applications M. Franzini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9245314
26. Reconstruction of extreme topography from UAV structure from motion photogrammetry F. Agüera-Vega et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.062
27. Monitoring Effect of Spatial Growth on Land Surface Temperature in Dhaka M. Rahman et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071191
28. Accuracy assessment of UAV-post-processing kinematic (PPK) and UAV-traditional (with ground control points) georeferencing methods T. Türk et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10170-0
29. Digital topographic mapping and modelling using low altitude unmanned aerial vehicle B. Nwilag et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01677-z
30. Accuracy Assessment of a UAV Direct Georeferencing Method and Impact of the Configuration of Ground Control Points X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6020030
31. Accurate ortho-mosaicked six-band multispectral UAV images as affected by mission planning for precision agriculture proposes F. Mesas-Carrascosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1249311
32. Geometric Accuracy of 3D Reality Mesh Utilization for BIM-Based Earthwork Quantity Estimation Workflows P. Kavaliauskas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10060399
33. Survey of the Ridracoli Dam: UAV–based photogrammetry and traditional topographic techniques in the inspection of vertical structures G. Buffi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1362039
34. Quantification and visualization of flood-induced morphological changes in meander structures by UAV-based monitoring S. Akay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.05.020
35. Short-Term Repeatability of Multispectral UAV Measurements and Implications for Vegetation Index Stability M. Änäkkälä et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16121134
36. Optimization of UAV Flight Missions in Steep Terrain K. Kozmus Trajkovski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081293
37. Accuracy Analysis of a Dam Model from Drone Surveys E. Ridolfi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081777
38. Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’ Imagery on Glaciers S. Gindraux et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020186
39. The impact of ground control points for the 3D study of grapevines in steep slope vineyards O. Stolarski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.422
40. Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used E. Sanz-Ablanedo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101606
41. Assessment of Slope Mapping by Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) M. Kahlid et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1347/1/012039
42. Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy in Slope Area with Different Flight Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) W. Syafuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012037
43. Comparing sUAS Photogrammetrically-Derived Point Clouds with GNSS Measurements and Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Topographic Mapping O. Mora et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3030064
44. Digital enhancement and photogrammetric recording of La Joquera Levantine rock art (Borriol, Castelló) I. Domingo et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2024.19906
45. Mapping Heterogeneous Buried Archaeological Features Using Multisensor Data from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles C. Brooke & B. Clutterbuck https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010041
46. RTK GNSS-Assisted Terrestrial SfM Photogrammetry without GCP: Application to Coastal Morphodynamics Monitoring M. Jaud et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111889