OBLIQUE MULTI-CAMERA SYSTEMS – ORIENTATION AND DENSE MATCHING ISSUES

34 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Geospatial Evaluation of Building Facility in Oyo State, Southwestern Nigeria R. Jimoh et al. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.811277
2. 3D Photogrammetry Point Cloud Segmentation Using a Model Ensembling Framework M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000929
3. Methodology of improvement of radiometric quality of images acquired from low altitudes M. Kedzierski & D. Wierzbicki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.003
4. Extracting three-dimensional (3D) spatial information from sequential oblique unmanned aerial system (UAS) imagery for digital surface modeling M. Cheng & M. Matsuoka https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1842538
5. A rapid and quantitative post-wildfire damage assessment of buildings in the 2025 Palisades fire in California based on InSAR Y. Du & D. Feng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105809
6. Detailed Three-Dimensional Building Façade Reconstruction: A Review on Applications, Data and Technologies A. Klimkowska et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14112579
7. Oblique aerial images: a review focusing on georeferencing procedures S. Verykokou & C. Ioannidis https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1444294
8. Suitability of the Spanish Open Public Cartographic Resources for BIM Site Modeling A. Bernal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-021-00164-x
9. Combining nadir and oblique UAV imagery to reconstruct quarry topography: methodology and feasibility analysis P. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1313097
10. Curved Buildings Reconstruction From Airborne LiDAR Data by Matching and Deforming Geometric Primitives J. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2995732
11. Radiometric quality assessment of images acquired by UAV’s in various lighting and weather conditions M. Kedzierski & D. Wierzbicki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.003
12. Detecting change in coral reef 3D structure using underwater photogrammetry: critical issues and performance metrics P. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-019-00263-w
13. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Physical Progress Monitoring of Construction N. Jacob-Loyola et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124227
14. Stable least-squares matching for oblique images using bound constrained optimization and a robust loss function H. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.019
15. 3D Reconstruction of Coastal Cliffs from Fixed-Wing and Multi-Rotor UAS: Impact of SfM-MVS Processing Parameters, Image Redundancy and Acquisition Geometry G. Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061222
16. OSSIM: An Object-Based Multiview Stereo Algorithm Using SSIM Index Matching Cost L. Fei et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2737033
17. An asymmetric re-weighting method for the precision combined bundle adjustment of aerial oblique images L. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.017
18. 3D flight planning for UAV-based photogrammetry in urban areas with an emphasis on solving problems caused by extreme scale differences and occlusion points S. Latifzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.52547/jgst.12.3.95
19. Urban Classification from Aerial and Satellite Images I. Pârvu et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2020-0024
20. Aerial multi-camera systems: Accuracy and block triangulation issues E. Rupnik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.12.020
21. Documentation of heritage buildings using close‐range UAV images: dense matching issues, comparison and case studies A. Murtiyoso & P. Grussenmeyer https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12197
22. Use of UAV oblique imaging for the detection of individual trees in residential environments Y. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.03.003
23. True orthoimage generation by mutual recovery of occlusion areas E. Yoo & D. Lee https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2015.1128629
24. Using Drones and 3D Modeling to Survey Tibetan Architectural Heritage: A Case Study with the Multi-Door Stupa Z. Sun & Y. Zhang https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072259
25. True 3D building reconstruction: façade, roof and overhang modelling from oblique and vertical aerial imagery D. Dahlke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2015.1071287
26. Planning airborne photogrammetry and remote-sensing missions with modern platforms and sensors M. Pepe et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1444945
27. Efficient structure from motion for large-scale UAV images: A review and a comparison of SfM tools S. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.016
28. Automatic Workflow for Roof Extraction and Generation of 3D CityGML Models from Low-Cost UAV Image-Derived Point Clouds A. Murtiyoso et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120743
29. Evaluation of multi-camera images in different SfM-MVS based photogrammetric software and comparison of digital products in generating 3D city models İ. Saglam & L. Karasaka https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102700
30. A UAV-based panoramic oblique photogrammetry (POP) approach using spherical projection X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.016
31. Identification of damage in buildings based on gaps in 3D point clouds from very high resolution oblique airborne images A. Vetrivel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.016
32. Accurate Reconstruction of the LoD3 Building Model by Integrating Multi-Source Point Clouds and Oblique Remote Sensing Imagery X. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8030135
33. A Review of Software Solutions to Process Ground-based Point Clouds in Forest Applications A. Murtiyoso et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-024-00228-2
34. Trying to Break New Ground in Aerial Archaeology G. Verhoeven & C. Sevara https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8110918