PRECISION AND ACCURACY PARAMETERS IN STRUCTURED LIGHT 3-D SCANNING

29 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Measurement of polymers with 3D optical scanners: evaluation of the subsurface scattering effect through five miniature step gauges M. Guerra et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab3edb
2. Design of Automated Robotic System for Draping Prepreg Composite Fabrics L. Ellekilde et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574720000193
3. 烟雾环境影响下目标偏振三维成像方法 张. Zhang Su et al. https://doi.org/10.3788/AOS251377
4. Freeform Hybrid Manufacturing: Binderjet, Structured Light Scanning, Confocal Microscopy, and CNC Machining J. Dvorak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7020079
5. An Adaptive Robotic System for Doing Pick and Place Operations with Deformable Objects T. Jørgensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-018-0958-6
6. Mapping and correcting the distortion of 3D structured light scanners F. Dickin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.06.001
7. An Error Estimation System for Close-Range Photogrammetric Systems and Algorithms A. Poroykov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23249715
8. Alignment of rendered images with photographs for testing appearance models M. Hannemose et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.398055
9. Benchmarking AI-Based Monocular Depth Estimators in Terms of Their Metrological Potential Following 3-D Sensor Guideline VDI/VDE 2634 R. Ramm et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2025.3647147
10. Accurate and efficient dimensional measurement technique based on point cloud models and its application in the automotive industry J. Chao & X. Zhou https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14669-3
11. Use of Miniature Step Gauges to Assess the Performance of 3D Optical Scanners and to Evaluate the Accuracy of a Novel Additive Manufacture Process M. Guerra et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030738
12. Using virtual reality for anatomical landmark annotation in geometric morphometrics D. Messer et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12869
13. From fragments to faces: using metrological analysis for artefact re-identification and provenience attribution C. Rindi Nuzzolo https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-02218-4
14. Systematic Selection and Industrial Evaluation of 3D Measurement Methods for Positional Tolerance Compensation in Final Assembly Lines M. Höhner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2026.05.245
15. Renaissance plaster casts: first insights by means of Structured Light 3D Scanner G. Gariani et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/techne.9127
16. A pseudo-3D ball lattice artifact and method for evaluating the metrological performance of structured-light 3D scanners P. Ghandali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.03.005
17. Accurate binocular stereo underwater measurement method X. Wu & X. Tang https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881419864468
18. Range-wide variation in grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) skull morphology A. Galatius et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2022.126023
19. Three-dimensional scanning for breast plastic and reconstructive surgery: An updated review M. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02152-3
20. Capturing patient anatomy for designing and manufacturing personalized prostheses N. Paxton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.09.004
21. An Edge-Preserving Nonlinear Error Suppression Method for Fringe Projection Profilometry Based on Low-Pass Guided Filtering H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics13040386
22. The Factors Affecting the Stamping Surface Assessment by the ABIS II Sensor R. Mendricky & K. Kubikova https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00445-1
23. A convolutional neural network and transformer-based method for automatic localization of aircraft skin sealing positions Y. An et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2025.110720
24. Quasi-calibration method for structured light system with auxiliary camera S. Son et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2024.111369
25. Benefits of 3D Printed and Customized Anatomical Footwear Insoles for Plantar Pressure Distribution S. Jandova & R. Mendricky https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2021.0002
26. Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer D. Messer et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11804
27. Calibration based on ray-tracing for multi-line structured light projection system X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.035884
28. Application of a new scan body for face‐driven fixed prosthetics N. Otawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.483
29. VDI/VDE 2634-2 and ISO 10360-13 performance evaluation tests, and systematic errors in structured light systems O. Icasio-Hernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2024.04.015