|
26 Sep 2018
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEGMENTATION METHODS USING OPTICAL SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ESTIMATE FUZZY CLUSTERING PARAMETERS FOR SENTINEL-1A SAR IMAGES
B. Bayram, N. Demir, B. Akpinar, S. Oy, F. Erdem, T. Vögtle, and D. Z. Seker
Related authors
ENHANCEMENT OF UNDERWATER IMAGES WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Z. Ertan, B. Korkut, G. Gördük, B. Kulavuz, T. Bakırman, and B. Bayram
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W9-2024, 149–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-149-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-149-2024, 2024
FOREST SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION BASED ON DEEP LEARNING USING SENTINEL-2 IMAGES
C. Hızal, G. Gülsu, H. Y. Akgün, B. Kulavuz, T. Bakırman, A. Aydın, and B. Bayram
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W9-2024, 229–236, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-229-2024, 2024
THE EFFICIENCY OF RANDOM FOREST METHOD FOR SHORELINE EXTRACTION FROM LANDSAT-8 AND GOKTURK-2 IMAGERIES
B. Bayram, F. Erdem, B. Akpinar, A. K. Ince, S. Bozkurt, H. Catal Reis, and D. Z. Seker
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-4-W4, 141–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-141-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-141-2017, 2017
COMPARISON OF TWO SIMPLIFICATION METHODS FOR SHORELINE EXTRACTION FROM DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTO IMAGES
B. Bayram, A. Sen, M. O. Selbesoglu, I. Vārna, P. Petersons, N. O. Aykut, and D. Z. Seker
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-4-W4, 147–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-147-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-147-2017, 2017
ENHANCEMENT OF UNDERWATER IMAGES WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Z. Ertan, B. Korkut, G. Gördük, B. Kulavuz, T. Bakırman, and B. Bayram
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W9-2024, 149–156, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-149-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-149-2024, 2024
FOREST SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION BASED ON DEEP LEARNING USING SENTINEL-2 IMAGES
C. Hızal, G. Gülsu, H. Y. Akgün, B. Kulavuz, T. Bakırman, A. Aydın, and B. Bayram
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W9-2024, 229–236, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-229-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-229-2024, 2024
SEMI-AUTOMATED CEMETERY MAPPING USING SMARTPHONES
N. Demir and N. Yogeswaran
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-5, 59–62, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-59-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-59-2018, 2018
THE EFFICIENCY OF RANDOM FOREST METHOD FOR SHORELINE EXTRACTION FROM LANDSAT-8 AND GOKTURK-2 IMAGERIES
B. Bayram, F. Erdem, B. Akpinar, A. K. Ince, S. Bozkurt, H. Catal Reis, and D. Z. Seker
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-4-W4, 141–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-141-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-141-2017, 2017
COMPARISON OF TWO SIMPLIFICATION METHODS FOR SHORELINE EXTRACTION FROM DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTO IMAGES
B. Bayram, A. Sen, M. O. Selbesoglu, I. Vārna, P. Petersons, N. O. Aykut, and D. Z. Seker
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-4-W4, 147–151, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-147-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-147-2017, 2017