USING DJI PHANTOM 4 RTK DRONE FOR TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF COASTAL AREAS

39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessing Long-Term Trends in Lateral Salt-Marsh Shoreline Change along a U.S. East Coast Latitudinal Gradient C. Burns et al. 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-19-00043.1
2. Integration of Lidar system, mobile laser scanning (MLS) and unmanned aerial vehicle system for generation of 3d building model application: A review M. Room & A. Anuar 10.1088/1755-1315/1064/1/012042
3. Fit-for-purpose WWTP unmanned aerial systems: A game changer towards an integrated and sustainable management strategy S. Dimitriadou et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174966
4. Natural and anthropogenic factors controlling organic carbon storage in riverine wetlands along South Korea’s four rivers S. Yun et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-84147-z
5. Clifford Geometric Algebra-Based Approach for 3D Modeling of Agricultural Images Acquired by UAVs P. Khan et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3045443
6. Real-time unmanned aerial vehicle surveying using spatial criteria: a simulated study D. Chatziparaschis & P. Partsinevelos 10.1117/1.JRS.17.014519
7. Accuracy assessment of post‐processing kinematic georeferencing based on uncrewed aerial vehicle‐based structures from motion multi‐view stereo photogrammetry M. Hayamizu & Y. Nakata 10.1111/1745-5871.12624
8. Potential of Ultra-High-Resolution UAV Images with Centimeter GNSS Positioning for Plant Scale Crop Monitoring J. Gilliot et al. 10.3390/rs14102391
9. Evaluating Ecosystem Services and Carbon Sequestration in Urban Wetlands: A Case Study of the Gapcheon Wetland in Daejeon, South Korea H. Lee et al. 10.9719/EEG.2024.57.5.633
10. Applicability of network real time kinematic (NRTK) approach in soil erosion measurement at different temporal and spatial scales K. Glavačević et al. 10.1007/s12518-025-00612-y
11. Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode Y. Taddia et al. 10.3390/drones4020009
12. A Systematic Review of UAVs for Island Coastal Environment and Risk Monitoring: Towards a Resilience Assessment J. Jessin et al. 10.3390/drones7030206
13. Early deformation structures connected to the progradation of a carbonate platform: The case of the Nuvolau Cassian platform (Dolomites - Italy) N. Menegoni et al. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105574
14. Avaliação da Acurácia de Mapeamento Planimétrico Executado por Aeronaves Remotamente Pilotadas para Fins de Caracterização de Linhas de Costa D. Santos et al. 10.7769/gesec.v16i8.5170
15. Rectification of Bowl-Shape Deformation of Tidal Flat DEM derived from UAV Imaging H. Lee & D. Han 10.3390/s20061602
16. Boosting the Timeliness of UAV Large Scale Mapping. Direct Georeferencing Approaches: Operational Strategies and Best Practices L. Teppati Losè et al. 10.3390/ijgi9100578
17. Rapid Assessment of Landslide Dynamics by UAV-RTK Repeated Surveys Using Ground Targets: The Ca’ Lita Landslide (Northern Apennines, Italy) G. Ciccarese et al. 10.3390/rs16061032
18. Direct Georeferencing UAV-SfM in High-Relief Topography: Accuracy Assessment and Alternative Ground Control Strategies along Steep Inaccessible Rock Slopes P. Nesbit et al. 10.3390/rs14030490
19. Accuracy Analysis of Real-Time Kinematic Drones as a Replacement for GPS Bases in River Surveying S. Hwang et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2024.24.4.11
20. Is it possible to generate accurate 3D point clouds with UAS-LIDAR and UAS-RGB photogrammetry without GCPs? A case study on a beach and rocky cliff Á. Gómez-Gutiérrez et al. 10.1007/s10980-024-01984-z
21. The Methodological Aspects of Constructing a High-Resolution DEM of Large Territories Using Low-Cost UAVs on the Example of the Sarycum Aeolian Complex, Dagestan, Russia A. Gafurov 10.3390/drones5010007
22. BEACH PROFILE USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE IMAGERY N. MOHD SHAFFIE & E. ARIFFIN 10.46754/umtjur.v3i4.242
23. Joint InSAR and Field Constraints on Faulting During the Mw 6.4, July 23, 2020, Nima/Rongma Earthquake in Central Tibet K. Li et al. 10.1029/2021JB022212
24. Accuracy Assessment of Direct Georeferencing for Photogrammetric Applications Based on UAS-GNSS for High Andean Urban Environments R. Salas López et al. 10.3390/drones6120388
25. Automatic Detection of Ceroxylon Palms by Deep Learning in a Protected Area in Amazonas (NW Peru) J. Sánchez-Vega et al. 10.3390/f16071061
26. High-Precision UAV Photogrammetry with RTK GNSS: Eliminating Ground Control Points M. Alkan 10.17350/HJSE19030000341
27. Topographic Analysis of Intertidal Polychaete Reefs (Sabellaria alveolata) at a Very High Spatial Resolution G. Brunier et al. 10.3390/rs14020307
28. Anatomy of a km-scale fault zone controlling the Oligo-Miocene bending of the Ligurian Alps (NW Italy): integration of field and 3D high-resolution digital outcrop model data L. Manna et al. 10.1186/s00015-023-00444-1
29. Tropical Cyclone Impacts on Headland Protected Bay D. Wishaw et al. 10.3390/geosciences10050190
30. Enhancing Efficiency while Maintaining Accuracy in Repeated Coastal Drone Monitoring through the Use of Fixed Structures as Ground Control Points H. Noh et al. 10.9765/KSCOE.2025.37.1.1
31. Comparative performance of convolutional neural networks for detecting and mapping a young Casuarina equisetifolia L. forest from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery Z. Hao et al. 10.1007/s11056-025-10111-y
32. Influence of temperate forest autumn leaf phenology on segmentation of tree species from UAV imagery using deep learning M. Cloutier et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.114283
33. Generation of Dense and High-Precision Digital Elevation Model Using Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Space-Borne TanDEM-X to Measure Exposed Area Change Due to Tidal Invasion H. Lee & D. Kim 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3195744
34. UAV-g 2019: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Geomatics F. Nex 10.3390/drones3030074
35. Measuring Vibrations in Large Structures with Laser-Doppler Vibrometry and Unmanned Aerial Systems: A Review and Outlook C. Rembe et al. 10.34133/adi.0103
36. Coastal benthic habitat mapping and monitoring by integrating aerial and water surface low-cost drones D. Ventura et al. 10.3389/fmars.2022.1096594
37. THE FEATURES OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR ROAD REPAIR OR RECONSTRUCTION K. Mamonov et al. 10.33042/2522-1809-2023-4-178-147-151
38. Effect of photography method and analysis settings in SfM without GCP by using RTK-UAV : investigation using along-road experiment data M. TAKATA et al. 10.4287/jsprs.60.211
39. Assessment of RTK Quadcopter and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry for Fine-Scale Monitoring of Coastal Topographic Complexity S. Bertin et al. 10.3390/rs14071679