QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF COMBINED IMU/GNSS DATA FOR DIRECT GEOREFERENCING IN THE CONTEXT OF UAV-BASED MAPPING

35 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. GPS precise point positioning for UAV photogrammetry B. Grayson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12259
2. Measurement of land surface temperature from oblique angle airborne thermal camera observations R. Byerlay et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1699672
3. Investigating Practical Impacts of Using Single-Antenna and Dual-Antenna GNSS/INS Sensors in UAS-Lidar Applications R. Brazeal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21165382
4. Influence of On-Site Camera Calibration with Sub-Block of Images on the Accuracy of Spatial Data Obtained by PPK-Based UAS Photogrammetry K. Pitombeira & E. Mitishita https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123126
5. A Laboratory for the Integration of Geomatic and Geomechanical Data: The Rock Pinnacle “Campanile di Val Montanaia” L. Tavasci et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194854
6. A Systematic Literature Review to Assist in Defining New Guidelines and Practical Handbooks for the Documentation of Built Heritage L. Teppati Losè & F. Rinaudo https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8070249
7. Consistency Analysis of RTK and Non-RTK UAV DSMs in Vegetated Areas U. Sefercik & M. Nazar https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3288947
8. Evaluating the potential of post-processing kinematic (PPK) georeferencing for UAV-based structure- from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry and surface change detection H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-807-2019
9. Performing low-altitude photogrammetric surveys, a comparative analysis of user-grade unmanned aircraft systems F. Mugnai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00421-7
10. Comparison of the strip- and block-wise aerial triangulation using different exterior orientation parameters weights A. Jouybari et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2020.1871086
11. Accurate Mapping Method for UAV Photogrammetry Without Ground Control Points in the Map Projection Frame J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3052466
12. Impact of UAV-Derived RTK/PPK Products on Geometric Correction of VHR Satellite Imagery M. Atik et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9040291
13. A Review of Emerging Technologies for an Assessment of Safety and Seismic Vulnerability and Damage Detection of Existing Masonry Structures M. Stepinac & M. Gašparović https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155060
14. Comparative performance analysis of precise point positioning technique in the UAV − based mapping B. Erol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114768
15. Monitoring 3D areal displacements by a new methodology and software using UAV photogrammetry K. Hastaoğlu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101916
16. Deriving Land and Water Surface Elevations in the Northeastern Yucatán Peninsula Using PPK GPS and UAV-Based Structure from Motion T. Pingel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2021.1871937
17. Accuracy assessment of kinematic PPP versus PPK for GNSS flights data processing M. Gurturk & M. Soycan https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2020.1865016
18. Bir Fotogrametrik Bilgisayarlı Görü Tekniği olarak İHA Fotogrametrisi O. ARSLAN https://doi.org/10.51534/tiha.1392600
19. Evaluation of the Georeferencing Accuracy of a Photogrammetric Model Using a Quadrocopter with Onboard GNSS RTK M. Štroner et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082318
20. Determining optimal photogrammetric adjustment of images obtained from a fixed‐wing UAV K. Pargieła & A. Rzonca https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12377
21. Multi-UAV Carrier Phase Differential GPS and Vision-based Sensing for High Accuracy Attitude Estimation A. Vetrella et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-018-0821-9
22. Flowering leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) detection using unmanned aerial vehicle imagery in biological control sites: Impacts of flight height, flight time and detection method X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.8
23. Accuracy Assessment of Direct Georeferencing for Photogrammetric Applications Based on UAS-GNSS for High Andean Urban Environments R. Salas López et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6120388
24. Challenges and Opportunities for UAV-Based Digital Elevation Model Generation for Flood-Risk Management: A Case of Princeville, North Carolina L. Hashemi-Beni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113843
25. Improved integrated navigation method of micro position and orientation system based on installation error angle calibration C. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac7380
26. İnsansız hava aracıyla elde edilen hava fotoğraflarından kızılçam ağaçlarının çap ve boylarının ölçümü ve gövde hacminin tahmini M. EKER et al. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.1199567
27. New Concept of Smart UAS-GCP: A Tool for Precise Positioning in Remote-Sensing Applications N. Famiglietti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8040123
28. On‐site geometric calibration of RPAS mounted sensors for SfM photogrammetric geomorphological surveys J. Senn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5338
29. Geospatial Tool and Geocloud Platform Innovations: A Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Assessment M. Koeva et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060557
30. Utilising RGB drone imagery and vegetation indices for accurate above-ground biomass estimation: a case study of the cradle nature reserve, Gauteng Province, South Africa C. Matyukira & P. Mhangara https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2024.2390512
31. Integration of UAV photography, field data and machine learning algorithms for stem volume estimation E. Yılmaz İnce et al. https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1739793
32. High-Quality UAV-Based Orthophotos for Cadastral Mapping: Guidance for Optimal Flight Configurations C. Stöcker et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213625
33. Observations of the surface current field in morphologically complex environments using drones F. Macedo & C. Schettini https://doi.org/10.1590/2675-2824073.24002
34. Automatic Workflow for Roof Extraction and Generation of 3D CityGML Models from Low-Cost UAV Image-Derived Point Clouds A. Murtiyoso et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120743
35. Evaluating the Potential of Digital Aerial Photogrammetry (DAP) versus Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) for Individual Tree Detection and Segmentation in Subtropical Chir Pine ( Pinus Roxburghii ) Forests T. Saeed et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2025.2592609