The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Download
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Articles | Volume XLIV-M-3-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-3-2021-163-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIV-M-3-2021-163-2021
10 Aug 2021
 | 10 Aug 2021

A COMPARISON OF RANDOM FOREST AND LIGHT GRADIENT BOOSTING MACHINE FOR FOREST ABOVE-GROUND BIOMASS ESTIMATION USING A COMBINATION OF LANDSAT, ALOS PALSAR, AND AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA

H. Tamiminia, B. Salehi, M. Mahdianpari, C. M. Beier, L. Johnson, and D. B. Phoenix

Keywords: Machine Learning, Above-ground Biomass, Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, LiDAR, Synthetic Aperture Radar

Abstract. Sustainable forest management is a critical topic which contributes to ecological, economical, and socio-cultural aspect of the environment. Providing accurate AGB maps is of paramount importance for sustainable forest management, carbon accounting, and climate change monitoring. The main goal of this study was to leverage the potential of two machine learning algorithms for predicting AGB using optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) datasets. To achieve this goal random forest (RF) and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) models were deployed to predict AGB values in Huntington Wild Forest (HWF) in Essex County, NY using continuous forest inventory (CFI) plots. Both models were trained and evaluated based on airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data, Landsat imagery, advanced land observing satellite (ALOS) phased array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR), and their combination. The integration of airborne LiDAR, optic, and SAR datasets provided the best results in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE). The RF model outperformed the LightGBM in all scenarios (LiDAR, Landsat 5, ALOS PALSAR, and their combination). The RF model was able to predict AGB values with the RMSE of 51.90 Mg/ha and MBE of −0.189 Mg/ha for the combination of LiDAR, optic, and SAR data, while LightGBM estimated the AGB values with the RMSE of 52.78 Mg/ha and MBE of −0.253 Mg/ha. LightGBM is more sensitive to noise and there are lots of hyperparameters that need to be tuned which highly affect its performance.