- Article
(1455 KB) - Metadata XML
- August 23, 2025
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
- |
- 𝕏
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume XLVIII-G-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1421-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1421-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
01 Aug 2025
| 01 Aug 2025
Quality assessment of ICESat-2 ATL03 denoising data based on spatial distribution and photon weight
Yuan Sun
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570, Singapore
Centre for Nature-based Climate Solutions, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117546, Singapore
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Xiaohua Tong
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Qi Xu
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Binbin Li
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Changda Liu
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Min Ji
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Planetary Mapping and Remote Sensing for Deep Space Exploration, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570, Singapore
Centre for Nature-based Climate Solutions, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117546, Singapore
Related authors
Binbin Li, Huan Xie, Shijie Liu, Zhen Ye, Zhonghua Hong, Qihao Weng, Yuan Sun, Qi Xu, and Xiaohua Tong
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 205–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-205-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-205-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We refined the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTER GDEM) with Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite 2 data to release a new dataset (IC2-GDEM). It has superior global elevation quality to ASTER GDEM. Its seamless integration with historical ASTER GDEM datasets is essential for longitudinal environmental studies. As a complementary data source to other GDEMs, it enables more reliable and comprehensive scientific discoveries.
Lixin Lin, Xixi Liu, and Yuan Sun
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-170, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-170, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We attempted to disentangle the covers of vegetation and water on soil organic carbon model using fuzzy disentangling. We used the model to simulate the soil organic carbon stocks in western European topsoil. The results show that the per-unit and total SOC stocks in western European topsoil as 99.742 t C ha−1 and 9.373 Pg, respectively. The gap of the results is narrower compared with previous study. The stable simulated values are the result of disentangling of the vegetation and water cover.
Q. Xu, H. Xie, Y. Sun, X. Liu, Y. Guo, P. Huang, B. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 309–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-309-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-309-2022, 2022
Huan Xie, Yifan Wang, Xiongfeng Yan, Ming Yang, Yaqiong Wang, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-G-2025, 1589–1594, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1589-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1589-2025, 2025
Peiqi Ye, Rong Huang, Puzuo Wang, Yusheng Xu, Zhen Ye, Yongjiu Feng, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-G-2025, 1641–1646, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1641-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1641-2025, 2025
Lingxiao Zhang, Rong Huang, Yusheng Xu, Zhen Ye, Changjiang Xiao, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-G-2025, 1699–1705, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1699-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1699-2025, 2025
Yi Zhang, Genyi Wan, Dayong Liu, Tao Tao, Changjiang Xiao, Zhen Ye, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-G-2025, 1727–1732, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1727-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1727-2025, 2025
Chen Liu, Rong Huang, Huan Xie, Tao Tao, Yongjiu Feng, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-G-2025, 959–966, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-959-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-959-2025, 2025
Binbin Li, Huan Xie, Shijie Liu, Zhen Ye, Zhonghua Hong, Qihao Weng, Yuan Sun, Qi Xu, and Xiaohua Tong
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 205–220, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-205-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-205-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We refined the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer Global Digital Elevation Model (ASTER GDEM) with Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite 2 data to release a new dataset (IC2-GDEM). It has superior global elevation quality to ASTER GDEM. Its seamless integration with historical ASTER GDEM datasets is essential for longitudinal environmental studies. As a complementary data source to other GDEMs, it enables more reliable and comprehensive scientific discoveries.
Leilei Jiao, Yusheng Xu, Rong Huang, Zhen Ye, Sicong Liu, Shijie Liu, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 629–635, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-629-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-629-2024, 2024
Jiarui Cao, Rong Huang, Zhen Ye, Yusheng Xu, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 51–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-51-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-51-2024, 2024
Yuanwei Qin, Xiangming Xiao, Hao Tang, Ralph Dubayah, Russell Doughty, Diyou Liu, Fang Liu, Yosio Shimabukuro, Egidio Arai, Xinxin Wang, and Berrien Moore III
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 321–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-321-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-321-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Forest definition has two major biophysical parameters, i.e., canopy height and canopy coverage. However, few studies have assessed forest cover maps in terms of these two parameters at a large scale. Here, we assessed the annual forest cover maps in the Brazilian Amazon using 1.1 million footprints of canopy height and canopy coverage. Over 93 % of our forest cover maps are consistent with the FAO forest definition, showing the high accuracy of these forest cover maps in the Brazilian Amazon.
S. Xu, R. Huang, Y. Xu, Z. Ye, H. Xie, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 771–776, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-771-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-771-2023, 2023
Lixin Lin, Xixi Liu, and Yuan Sun
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-170, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-170, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We attempted to disentangle the covers of vegetation and water on soil organic carbon model using fuzzy disentangling. We used the model to simulate the soil organic carbon stocks in western European topsoil. The results show that the per-unit and total SOC stocks in western European topsoil as 99.742 t C ha−1 and 9.373 Pg, respectively. The gap of the results is narrower compared with previous study. The stable simulated values are the result of disentangling of the vegetation and water cover.
Yuelong Xiao, Qunming Wang, Xiaohua Tong, and Peter M. Atkinson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3365–3386, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forest age is closely related to forest production, carbon cycles, and other ecosystem services. Existing stand age products in China derived from remote-sensing images are of a coarse spatial resolution and are not suitable for applications at the regional scale. Here, we mapped young forest ages across China at an unprecedented fine spatial resolution of 30 m. The overall accuracy (OA) of the generated map of young forest stand ages across China was 90.28 %.
H. Zhang, B. Xie, S. Liu, R. Ding, Z. Ye, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2022, 79–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-79-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-79-2022, 2022
Q. Xu, H. Xie, Y. Sun, X. Liu, Y. Guo, P. Huang, B. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 309–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-309-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-309-2022, 2022
H. Zhang, Y. Shang, X. Tong, J. Chen, W. Ma, M. Li, Y. Lu, and H. Chen
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2022, 619–625, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-619-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-619-2022, 2022
Lei Ma, George Hurtt, Lesley Ott, Ritvik Sahajpal, Justin Fisk, Rachel Lamb, Hao Tang, Steve Flanagan, Louise Chini, Abhishek Chatterjee, and Joseph Sullivan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1971–1994, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1971-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1971-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a global version of the Ecosystem Demography (ED) model which can track vegetation 3-D structure and scale up ecological processes from individual vegetation to ecosystem scale. Model evaluation against multiple benchmarking datasets demonstrated the model’s capability to simulate global vegetation dynamics across a range of temporal and spatial scales. With this version, ED has the potential to be linked with remote sensing observations to address key scientific questions.
Rongxing Li, Hongwei Li, Tong Hao, Gang Qiao, Haotian Cui, Youquan He, Gang Hai, Huan Xie, Yuan Cheng, and Bofeng Li
The Cryosphere, 15, 3083–3099, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of an assessment of ICESat-2 surface elevations along the 520 km CHINARE route in East Antarctica. The assessment was performed based on coordinated multi-sensor observations from a global navigation satellite system, corner cube retroreflectors, retroreflective target sheets, and UAVs. The validation results demonstrate that ICESat-2 elevations are accurate to 1.5–2.5 cm and can potentially overcome the uncertainties in the estimation of mass balance in East Antarctica.
H. Cui, R. Li, H. Li, T. Hao, G. Qiao, Y. He, G. Hai, H. Xie, Y. Cheng, and B. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 443–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-443-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-443-2021, 2021
S. Luo, Y. Cheng, Z. Li, Y. Wang, K. Wang, X. Wang, G. Qiao, W. Ye, Y. Li, M. Xia, X. Yuan, Y. Tian, X. Tong, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 491–496, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-491-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-491-2021, 2021
Y. Gong, H. Xie, X. Tong, Y. Jin, X. Xv, and Q. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B4-2020, 103–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-103-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-103-2020, 2020
H. Zhang, S. Liu, Z. Ye, X. Tong, H. Xie, S. Zheng, and Q. Du
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2020, 149–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-149-2020, 2020
Z. Ye, Y. Xu, C. Wei, X. Tong, and U. Stilla
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2020, 157–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-157-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-157-2020, 2020
Y. Lu, J. Zhang, X. Tong, X. Lu, W. Han, H. Zhang, H. Zhao, and X. Liu
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-141-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-141-2020, 2020
Y. Wang, X. Tong, H. Xie, M. Jiang, Y. Huang, S. Liu, X. Xu, Q. Du, Q. Wang, and C. Wang
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 603–608, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-603-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-603-2020, 2020
Q. Fu, S. Liu, X. Tong, and H. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W16, 91–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W16-91-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W16-91-2019, 2019
S. Gao, Z. Ye, C. Wei, X. Liu, and X. Tong
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W7, 33–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W7-33-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W7-33-2019, 2019
Y. Lu, J. Zhang, X. Tong, W. Han, and H. Zhao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1243–1247, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1243-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1243-2019, 2019
Y. Cheng, X. Li, G. Qiao, W. Ye, Y. Huang, Y. Li, K. Wang, Y. Tian, X. Tong, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1735–1739, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1735-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1735-2019, 2019
R. Li, D. Lv, H. Xiao, S. Liu, Y. Cheng, G. Hai, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1759–1763, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1759-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1759-2019, 2019
R. Li, H. Xie, Y. Tian, W. Du, J. Chen, G. Hai, S. Zhang, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1765–1769, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1765-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1765-2019, 2019
Z. Ye, Y. Xu, L. Hoegner, X. Tong, and U. Stilla
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 147–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-147-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-147-2019, 2019
Y. Tian, S. Zhang, W. Du, J. Chen, H. Xie, X. Tong, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 1657–1660, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1657-2018, 2018
Wenping Song, Shijie Liu, Xiaohua Tong, Changling Niu, Zhen Ye, Han Zhang, and Yanmin Jin
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3, 193–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-193-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-193-2018, 2018
Xin Zhang, Shijie Liu, Haifeng Yu, Xiaohua Tong, and Guoman Huang
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3, 267–271, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-267-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-267-2018, 2018
W. Du, L. Chen, H. Xie, G. Hai, S. Zhang, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1513–1516, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1513-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1513-2017, 2017
G. Hai, H. Xie, J. Chen, L. Chen, R. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1517–1520, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1517-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1517-2017, 2017
M. Xia, G. Tang, Y. Tian, W. Ye, R. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1569–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1569-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1569-2017, 2017
H. Xiao, S. Liu, R. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1575–1577, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1575-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1575-2017, 2017
Rongxing Li, Haifeng Xiao, Shijie Liu, and Xiaohua Tong
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-178, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-178, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Fracturing in the RFIS was slightly increased, particularly at its front, from 2003 to 2015. They do not seem to suggest an immediate significant impact on the stability of the shelf. However, with the rapid changes and 3D measurements of Rifts 1 and 2, the most active activities occurred at the front of the FIS from 2001 to 2016. A potential upcoming major calving event in FIS is estimated to occur in 2051. The stability of the ice shelf, particularly Rifts 1 and 2, should be closely monitored.
C. Guo, X. Tong, S. Liu, S. Liu, X. Lu, P. Chen, Y. Jin, and H. Xie
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W1, 49–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-49-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-49-2017, 2017
W. Zhao, X. Tong, H. Xie, Y. Jin, S. Liu, D. Wu, X. Liu, L. Guo, and Q. Zhou
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W1, 213–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-213-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-213-2017, 2017
Q. Zhou, X. Tong, S. Liu, X. Lu, S. Liu, P. Chen, Y. Jin, and H. Xie
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W1, 219–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-219-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-219-2017, 2017
W. Cao, X. H. Tong, S. C. Liu, and D. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B8, 25–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-25-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-25-2016, 2016
H. Tang, S. Ganguly, G. Zhang, M. A. Hofton, R. F. Nelson, and R. Dubayah
Biogeosciences, 13, 239–252, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-239-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-239-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides a unique insight into vertical distribution of leaf area index across North American ecosystems using spaceborne lidar data. This data set of leaf area index and vertical foliage profile can help set up a baseline of canopy structure needed for evaluating climate and land use induced forest changes at continental scale in the future.
T. Feng, Z. Hong, Q. Fu, S. Ma, X. Jie, H. Wu, C. Jiang, and X. Tong
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2165–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2165-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2165-2014, 2014
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org