REMOVAL OF TREE OFFSETS FROM SRTM AND OTHER DIGITAL SURFACE MODELS

25 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The floodplain inundation history of the Murray-Darling Basin through two-monthly maximum water depth maps D. Penton et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02559-4
2. Variability of Interpolation Errors and Mutual Enhancement of Different Interpolation Methods Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411493
3. A method for combining SRTM DEM and ASTER GDEM2 to improve topography estimation in regions without reference data H. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.026
4. The Application of Directional Univariate Structure Functions Analysis for Studying the Spatial Anisotropy of Environmental Variables D. Svidzinska https://doi.org/10.2478/eko-2019-0011
5. A multi-sensor approach towards a global vegetation corrected SRTM DEM product F. O'Loughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.018
6. SiteFinder: A geospatial scoping tool to assist the siting of external water harvesting structures R. Delaney et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107836
7. Evaluation of DEM Accuracy Improvement Methods Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion in Typical Gully Areas of Loess Plateau J. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083878
8. Improving the Accuracy of Open Source Digital Elevation Models with Multi-Scale Fusion and a Slope Position-Based Linear Regression Method Y. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121861
9. Assessing Spatial Flood Vulnerability at Kalapara Upazila in Bangladesh Using an Analytic Hierarchy Process M. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061302
10. Urban correction of global DEMs using building density for Nairobi, Kenya V. Olajubu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00647-w
11. Analysis of Relations between the Landscape Morphometric Characteristics and Forest Productivity (Using the Example of Leningrad Oblast) A. Alekseev & D. Chernikhovskii https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425520070021
12. Tropical cyclone risk mapping for a coastal city using geospatial techniques A. Akter & A. Dayem https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-020-00788-y
13. Assessing tropical cyclone risks using geospatial techniques M. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.004
14. THE LATEST DTM USING INSAR FOR DYNAMICS DETECTION OF SEMANGKO FAULT-INDONESIA A. Julzarika et al. https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2021.12621
15. Automated Estimation of Sub-Canopy Topography Combined with Single-Baseline Single-Polarization TanDEM-X InSAR and ICESat-2 Data H. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16071155
16. Sub-Canopy Topography Estimation from TanDEM-X DEM by Fusing ALOS-2 PARSAR-2 InSAR Coherence and GEDI Data P. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247304
17. Modelling tropical cyclone risks for present and future climate change scenarios using geospatial techniques M. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1320595
18. The influence correction of boreal forest vegetation on SRTM data A. Zhogolev & I. Savin https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1277272
19. THE EXPERIENCE OF GIS APPLICATION FOR AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS OF RELIEF MORPHOLOGY USING RADAR REMOTE SENSING DATA I. Chervanyov & V. Popov https://doi.org/10.15407/ugz2020.03.013
20. How good is TanDEM-X 50 m forest/non-forest map? Product validation using temporally corrected geo-browser supplied imagery through Collect Earth E. Akturk et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2023.2183959
21. RF-MEP: A novel Random Forest method for merging gridded precipitation products and ground-based measurements O. Baez-Villanueva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111606
22. New Method to Correct Vegetation Bias in a Copernicus Digital Elevation Model to Improve Flow Path Delineation G. Brochado & C. Rennó https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224332
23. Shaping the Global High-Resolution TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model M. Huber et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3095178
24. Dynamics of changes in lake volume and surface area using multi-source geospatial data A. Julzarika & A. Suhadha https://doi.org/10.2298/GSGD2501067J
25. Digital elevation modeling through forests: the challenge of the Amazon L. POLIDORI et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392202103091