DIRECT GEOREFERENCING WITH ON BOARD NAVIGATION COMPONENTS OF LIGHT WEIGHT UAV PLATFORMS

37 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Cost-Effective Geocoding with Exterior Orientation for Airborne and Terrestrial Archaeological Photography — Possibilities and Limitations M. Wieser et al. https://doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.3.1.97
2. A Low Cost UWB Based Solution for Direct Georeferencing UAV Photogrammetry A. Masiero et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050414
3. Mapping and Classification of Ecologically Sensitive Marine Habitats Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery and Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) D. Ventura et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091331
4. Estimating Biomass of Barley Using Crop Surface Models (CSMs) Derived from UAV-Based RGB Imaging J. Bendig et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61110395
5. High-Quality UAV-Based Orthophotos for Cadastral Mapping: Guidance for Optimal Flight Configurations C. Stöcker et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213625
6. A Comparative Analysis of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Low Altitude Photogrammetric Surveys F. Mugnai & G. Tucci https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030726
7. Direct georeferencing of airborne pushbroom images C. Yeh & V. Tsai https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2015.1009410
8. A Stacking Ensemble Approach for Postdisaster Building Damage Assessment S. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-7005
9. Application and Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Survey Imagery after Salvage Logging in Different Terrain Conditions A. Đuka et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13122054
10. 3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys M. James et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4125
11. Using Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to Map Seagrass Cover from Sentinel-2 Imagery S. Carpenter et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030477
12. Modelling glacier topography in Antarctica using unmanned aerial survey: assessment of opportunities D. Bliakharskii et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1584926
13. Obtaining World Coordinate Information of UAV in GNSS Denied Environments C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082241
14. Aerial path planning for urban scene reconstruction N. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272127.3275010
15. Comparison of the strip- and block-wise aerial triangulation using different exterior orientation parameters weights A. Jouybari et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2020.1871086
16. Conjugated-Point Positioning Method Based on Multiview Images J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3247919
17. Performing low-altitude photogrammetric surveys, a comparative analysis of user-grade unmanned aircraft systems F. Mugnai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00421-7
18. Evaluations on multi-scale camera networks for precise and geo-accurate reconstructions from aerial and terrestrial images with user guidance M. Rumpler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2016.04.008
19. UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review F. Nex & F. Remondino https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x
20. Numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis of UAS trajectory determination with robotic total stations L. Dammert et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2025.2517540
21. Testing Accuracy and Repeatability of UAV Blocks Oriented with GNSS-Supported Aerial Triangulation F. Benassi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020172
22. Crowd-Sourced Wildfire Spread Prediction With Remote Georeferencing Using Smartphones N. Bogdos & E. Manolakos https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2931456
23. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Direct Georeferencing of Photogrammetric Products in a Large Area with Steep Topography D. Pasillas-Pasillas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics6030052
24. Accuracy assessment of different photogrammetric software for processing data from low-cost UAV platforms in forest conditions M. Brach et al. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2986-012
25. Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery D. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2265295
26. Determining the Suitable Number of Ground Control Points for UAS Images Georeferencing by Varying Number and Spatial Distribution V. Oniga et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050876
27. Towards Automatic UAS-Based Snow-Field Monitoring for Microclimate Research P. Gabrlik et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081945
28. Assessment of UAV-based digital surface model and the effects of quantity and distribution of ground control points G. Gomes Pessoa et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1800122
29. Statistical comparison analysis of different real-time kinematic methods for the development of photogrammetric products: CORS-RTK, CORS-RTK + PPK, RTK-DRTK2, and RTK + DRTK2 + GCP S. Monjardín-Armenta et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0650
30. A Review on UAS Trajectory Estimation Using Decentralized Multi-Sensor Systems Based on Robotic Total Stations L. Dammert et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25133838
31. DG-SLAM: A hybrid direct georeferencing and SLAM framework for real-time orthophoto mapping in weak-textured environments Y. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.07.004
32. Stability Analysis of a Landslide Scarp by Means of Virtual Outcrops: The Mt. Peron Niche Area (Masiere di Vedana Rock Avalanche, Eastern Southern Alps) F. Livio et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.863880
33. Boresight Calibration of GNSS/INS-Assisted Push-Broom Hyperspectral Scanners on UAV Platforms A. Habib et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2813263
34. Calibration and accuracy assessment in a direct georeferencing system for UAS photogrammetry P. Gabrlik et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1434331
35. Urban area change visualization and analysis using high density spatial data from time series aerial images C. Altuntas https://doi.org/10.2478/rgg-2019-0001
36. Assessing optimal UAV-data pre-processing workflows for quality ortho-image generation to support coral reef mapping N. Zaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2037732
37. Automated Aerial Triangulation for UAV-Based Mapping F. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121952