MOBILE 3D MAPPING WITH A LOW-COST UAV SYSTEM

39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Application of Deep Learning and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle on Building Maintenance R. Kung et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5598690
2. Comparative Analysis of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Terrestrial Laser Scanning Application for Coastal Zone Monitoring A. Danchenkov & N. Belov https://doi.org/10.2205/2023ES000854
3. An Approach to Produce a GIS Database for Road Surface Monitoring K. Fendi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.042
4. Estimation of dump and landfill waste volumes using unmanned aerial systems T. Filkin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.029
5. Potentials of Low-Budget Microdrones: Processing 3D Point Clouds and Images for Representing Post-Industrial Landmarks in Immersive Virtual Environments M. Weißmann et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.886240
6. Drones and digital photogrammetry: from classifications to continuums for monitoring river habitat and hydromorphology A. Woodget et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1222
7. Disturbance feedbacks on the height of woody vegetation in a savannah: a multi-plot assessment using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) M. Mayr et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1362132
8. Digital survey from drone in archaeology: potentiality, limits, territorial archaeological context and variables A. Pecci https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/949/1/012075
9. How to Build a 2D and 3D Aerial Multispectral Map?—All Steps Deeply Explained A. Vong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163227
10. UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review F. Nex & F. Remondino https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x
11. Combining UAV-based plant height from crop surface models, visible, and near infrared vegetation indices for biomass monitoring in barley J. Bendig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.02.012
12. Kısıtlı Sulama Uygulamalarının İHA Multispektral Algılamaya Dayalı Vejetasyon İndekslerine Etkisi S. DEMİR & L. BAŞAYİĞİT https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.910909
13. A Low-Cost and Ultralight Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Borne Multicamera Imaging System Based on Smartphones H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8524400
14. Accuracy comparison of rock discontinuity geometric parameters in photogrammetry based on two georeferencing methods: Control points and geotagged photos J. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111880
15. Performance Evaluation of 3D Modelling Software for UAV Photogrammetry H. CHIKATSU et al. https://doi.org/10.4287/jsprs.55.117
16. Generalising Rescue Operations in Disaster Scenarios Using Drones: A Lifelong Reinforcement Learning Approach J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones9060409
17. Accuracy Assessment of Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Photogrammetry I. Elkhrachy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.011
18. Accuracy of stockpile estimates using low-cost sUAS photogrammetry O. Mora et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1723167
19. Analysis and Comparison of Lines Obtained from GNSS and UAV for Large-Scale Maps A. Mozas-Calvache & J. Pérez-García https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000215
20. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to Analyze the Urban Environment E. Bakogiannis et al. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejef.v3i2.p20-28
21. Deriving bathymetries from unmanned aerial vehicles: a case study of a small intermittent reservoir S. Massuel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1988614
22. Estimating River Discharges in Ungauged Catchments Using the Slope–Area Method and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112361
23. Accuracy Assessment of 3D Photogrammetric Models from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle S. Barba et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3040079
24. The Use of Direct Georeferencing in Aerial Photogrammetry with Micro UAV P. Gabrlik https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.07.064
25. Understanding Forest Health with Remote Sensing, Part III: Requirements for a Scalable Multi-Source Forest Health Monitoring Network Based on Data Science Approaches A. Lausch et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071120
26. Performance analysis of vertically offset overlapped propulsion system based quadrotor in an aerial mapping mission G. Nandakumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756829318809706
27. Kentsel alanlarda ağaç yükseklik bilgilerinin ICESat-2/ATLAS ve İHA verilerinden elde edilmesi M. AĞCA et al. https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1384320
28. Trends, benefits, and barriers of unmanned aerial systems in the construction industry: a survey study in the United States G. Albeaino & M. Gheisari https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.006
29. Positional Precision Analysis of Orthomosaics Derived from Drone Captured Aerial Imagery I. Hung et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3020046
30. Comparative Assessment of Vertical Precision of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Geodetic Survey for Road Construction: A Multi-Platform and Multi-Software Approach B. Malić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10110287
31. Accuracy of Structure from Motion models in comparison with terrestrial laser scanner for the analysis of DBH and height influence on error behaviour D. Panagiotidis et al. https://doi.org/10.17221/92/2015-JFS
32. Accuracy assessment using different UAV image overlaps H. Sadeq https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2018-0014
33. Inaccuracy of relative elevations on uavbased digital elevation models without precise reference information V. Zorina & A. Entin https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2024-3123
34. Low Cost and Flexible UAV Deployment of Sensors L. Sørensen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010154
35. Enhancing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Performance: A Comprehensive Review of Aerodynamic Improvement Techniques at Low Reynolds Numbers M. Esfandabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijae/6134144
36. Brief Communication: The use of an unmanned aerial vehicle in a rockfall emergency scenario D. Giordan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-163-2015
37. The use of kinematic photogrammetry and LiDAR for reconstruction of a unique object with extreme topography: a case study of Dutchman’s Cap, Baltic seacoast, Lithuania B. Ruzgienė et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2025.1397513
38. Toward a High Spatial Resolution Aerial Monitoring Network for Nature Conservation—How Can Remote Sensing Help Protect Natural Areas? G. Bakó et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168807
39. DEVELOPMENT OF THE REMOTE-PILOTED VEHICLE ALGORITHMIC SUPPORT AND ON-BOARD NAVIGATION COMPLEX STRUCTURE M. Mykyjchuk & V. Markiv https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.8028