- Article
(3536 KB) - Metadata XML
- November 05, 2024
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume XLII-2
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-813-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-813-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
30 May 2018
| 30 May 2018
USE OF FISHEYE PARROT BEBOP 2 IMAGES FOR 3D MODELLING USING COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOFTWARE
D. Pagliari
Politecnico di Milano, DICA - Geodesy and Geomatics section, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
L. Pinto
Politecnico di Milano, DICA - Geodesy and Geomatics section, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
Related authors
G. Ronchetti, D. Pagliari, and G. Sona
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 983–989, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-983-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-983-2018, 2018
L. Rossi, C. I. De Gaetani, D. Pagliari, E. Realini, M. Reguzzoni, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 991–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-991-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-991-2018, 2018
Francesco Avanzi, Alberto Bianchi, Alberto Cina, Carlo De Michele, Paolo Maschio, Diana Pagliari, Daniele Passoni, Livio Pinto, Marco Piras, and Lorenzo Rossi
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-57, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-57, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We compare three different instruments used to collect snow depth, i.e., photogrammetric surveys using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), a 3D laser scanning, and manual probing. The relatively high density of manual data (135 pt over 6700 m2, i.e., 2 pt/100 m2) enables to assess the performance of UAS in capturing the marked spatial variability of snow. Results suggest that UAS represent a competitive choice among existing techniques for high-precision, high-resolution remote sensing of snow.
D. Pagliari, L. Pinto, M. Reguzzoni, and L. Rossi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B5, 565–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-565-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-565-2016, 2016
Federica Gaspari, Francesco Ioli, Federico Barbieri, Samuele Bonora, Rebecca Fascia, Livio Pinto, and Federica Migliaccio
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W12-2024, 59–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-59-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W12-2024-59-2024, 2024
R. Fascia, F. Barbieri, F. Gaspari, F. Ioli, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-2-W4-2024, 205–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W4-2024-205-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-2-W4-2024-205-2024, 2024
F. Gaspari, F. Barbieri, J. P. Duque, R. Fascia, F. Ioli, G. Zani, D. Carrion, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 299–306, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-299-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-299-2023, 2023
F. Ioli, F. Barbieri, F. Gaspari, F. Nex, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 1037–1044, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1037-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-1037-2023, 2023
F. Gaspari, F. Ioli, F. Barbieri, C. Rivieri, M. Dondi, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-2-2023, 661–668, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-661-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-661-2023, 2023
F. Gaspari, F. Barbieri, I. Demnati, F. Ioli, L. Pinto, and V. Toscani
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W7-2023, 61–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W7-2023-61-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W7-2023-61-2023, 2023
F. Ioli, E. Bruno, D. Calzolari, M. Galbiati, A. Mannocchi, P. Manzoni, M. Martini, A. Bianchi, A. Cina, C. De Michele, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-1-2023, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-137-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-1-2023-137-2023, 2023
F. Gaspari, F. Ioli, F. Barbieri, E. Belcore, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 995–1002, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-995-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-995-2022, 2022
F. Ioli, A. Pinto, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 1025–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1025-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-1025-2022, 2022
Piera Belotti, Fabio Conzi, Chiara Dell’Orto, Maurizio Federici, Luigi Fregonese, Gabriele Garnero, Emilio Guastamacchia, Franco Guzzetti, Livio Pinto, and Marco Scaioni
Proc. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 4, 12, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-4-12-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-4-12-2021, 2021
F. Ioli, L. Pinto, and F. Ferrario
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 25–32, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-25-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-25-2021, 2021
L. Rossi, F. Ioli, E. Capizzi, L. Pinto, and M. Reguzzoni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2021, 61–68, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-61-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2021-61-2021, 2021
L. Pinto, F. Bianchini, V. Nova, and D. Passoni
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 1145–1150, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1145-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-1145-2020, 2020
F. Ioli, L. Pinto, D. Passoni, V. Nova, and M. Detert
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2020, 597–604, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-597-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-597-2020, 2020
C. Cappelletti, M. Boniardi, A. Casaroli, C. I. De Gaetani, D. Passoni, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W9, 227–234, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-227-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W9-227-2019, 2019
G. Ronchetti, D. Pagliari, and G. Sona
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 983–989, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-983-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-983-2018, 2018
L. Rossi, C. I. De Gaetani, D. Pagliari, E. Realini, M. Reguzzoni, and L. Pinto
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 991–998, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-991-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-991-2018, 2018
S. Gagliolo, R. Fagandini, B. Federici, I. Ferrando, D. Passoni, D. Pagliari, L. Pinto, and D. Sguerso
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-5-W1, 81–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-81-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-W1-81-2017, 2017
Francesco Avanzi, Alberto Bianchi, Alberto Cina, Carlo De Michele, Paolo Maschio, Diana Pagliari, Daniele Passoni, Livio Pinto, Marco Piras, and Lorenzo Rossi
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-57, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-57, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
We compare three different instruments used to collect snow depth, i.e., photogrammetric surveys using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), a 3D laser scanning, and manual probing. The relatively high density of manual data (135 pt over 6700 m2, i.e., 2 pt/100 m2) enables to assess the performance of UAS in capturing the marked spatial variability of snow. Results suggest that UAS represent a competitive choice among existing techniques for high-precision, high-resolution remote sensing of snow.
D. Pagliari, L. Pinto, M. Reguzzoni, and L. Rossi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B5, 565–572, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-565-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-565-2016, 2016
Carlo De Michele, Francesco Avanzi, Daniele Passoni, Riccardo Barzaghi, Livio Pinto, Paolo Dosso, Antonio Ghezzi, Roberto Gianatti, and Giacomo Della Vedova
The Cryosphere, 10, 511–522, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-511-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-511-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate snow depth distribution at peak accumulation over a small Alpine area using photogrammetry-based surveys with a fixed wing unmanned aerial system. Results reveal that UAS estimations of point snow depth present an average difference with reference to manual measurements equal to -0.073 m. Moreover, in this case study snow depth standard deviation (hence coefficient of variation) increases with decreasing cell size, but it stabilizes for resolutions smaller than 1 m.
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org