INTERACTION BETWEEN DIRECT GEOREFERENCING, CONTROL POINT CONFIGURATION AND CAMERA SELF-CALIBRATION FOR RTK-BASED UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY

26 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Structure-From-Motion (SfM) for Monitoring the Changed Flow Paths and Wetness in Minerotrophic Peatland Restoration L. Ikkala et al. 10.3390/rs14133169
2. Integrating a UAV-Derived DEM in Object-Based Image Analysis Increases Habitat Classification Accuracy on Coral Reefs B. Nieuwenhuis et al. 10.3390/rs14195017
3. Is it possible to generate accurate 3D point clouds with UAS-LIDAR and UAS-RGB photogrammetry without GCPs? A case study on a beach and rocky cliff Á. Gómez-Gutiérrez et al. 10.1007/s10980-024-01984-z
4. Determining the Spectral Characteristics of Fynbos Wetland Vegetation Species Using Unmanned Aerial Vehichle Data K. Musungu et al. 10.3390/geomatics5020017
5. Measurement of Soil Tillage Using UAV High-Resolution 3D Data C. Rebelo & J. Nascimento 10.3390/rs13214336
6. Analysis of the Qualitative Parameters of Mobile Laser Scanning for the Creation of Cartographic Works and 3D Models for Digital Twins of Urban Areas Ľ. Kovanič et al. 10.3390/app15042073
7. Multi-Sensor Data Fusion for 3D Reconstruction of Complex Structures: A Case Study on a Real High Formwork Project L. Zhao et al. 10.3390/rs15051264
8. From Data and Metadata to HBIM-GIS Integration R. Fernandes Dionizio & E. Dezen-Kempter 10.1080/15583058.2024.2439916
9. Influence of On-Site Camera Calibration with Sub-Block of Images on the Accuracy of Spatial Data Obtained by PPK-Based UAS Photogrammetry K. Pitombeira & E. Mitishita 10.3390/rs15123126
10. Optimal Self-Calibration Strategies in the Combined Bundle Adjustment of Aerial–Terrestrial Integrated Images L. Xie et al. 10.3390/rs14091969
11. Investigation of 3D models acquired with UAV oblique images H. MAKİNECİ & L. KARASAKA 10.48053/turkgeo.980559
12. Photogrammetry Using UAV-Mounted GNSS RTK: Georeferencing Strategies without GCPs M. Štroner et al. 10.3390/rs13071336
13. From consumer to enterprise grade: How the choice of four UAS impacts point cloud quality M. Stark et al. 10.1002/esp.5142
14. Determination of Accuracy and Usability of a SLAM Scanner GeoSLAM Zeb Horizon: A Bridge Structure Case Study R. Urban et al. 10.3390/app14125258
15. Bir Fotogrametrik Bilgisayarlı Görü Tekniği olarak İHA Fotogrametrisi O. ARSLAN 10.51534/tiha.1392600
16. Object Recognition of a GCP Design in UAS Imagery Using Deep Learning and Image Processing—Proof of Concept Study D. Becker & J. Klonowski 10.3390/drones7020094
17. Methodology of Processing Single-Strip Blocks of Imagery with Reduction and Optimization Number of Ground Control Points in UAV Photogrammetry M. Lalak et al. 10.3390/rs12203336
18. Virtual Reality as a Tool for Sustainable Training and Education of Employees in Industrial Enterprises V. Holuša et al. 10.3390/su151712886
19. On‐site geometric calibration of RPAS mounted sensors for SfM photogrammetric geomorphological surveys J. Senn et al. 10.1002/esp.5338
20. Evaluating the Performance of sUAS Photogrammetry with PPK Positioning for Infrastructure Mapping C. McMahon et al. 10.3390/drones5020050
21. Navigating the Future of Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Automatic All-Terrain Vehicles in Precision Farming M. Padhiary et al. 10.1007/s40030-024-00816-2
22. Drones and Real-Time Kinematic Base Station Integration for Documenting Inaccessible Ruins: A Case Study Approach D. Treccani et al. 10.3390/drones8060268
23. Improving UAV-SfM time-series accuracy by co-alignment and contributions of ground control or RTK positioning E. Nota et al. 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102772
24. Conventional and UAV-Based Aerial Surveys for Long-Term Monitoring (1954–2020) of a Highly Active Rock Glacier in Austria V. Kaufmann et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.732744
25. UAV-Based Forest Health Monitoring: A Systematic Review S. Ecke et al. 10.3390/rs14133205
26. Enhancing Hill Farming Efficiency Using Unmanned Agricultural Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review M. Padhiary et al. 10.1007/s41403-024-00458-7