- Article
(982 KB) - Metadata XML
- November 21, 2024
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume XLII-2/W13
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1735-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1735-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
05 Jun 2019
| 05 Jun 2019
ICE FLOW VELOCITY MAPPING OF EAST ANTARCTICA FROM 1963 TO 1989
Y. Cheng
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
X. Li
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
G. Qiao
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
W. Ye
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
Y. Huang
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
Y. Li
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
K. Wang
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
Y. Tian
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
X. Tong
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
Center for Spatial Information Science and Sustainable Development, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai, China
Related authors
Chengjin Yan, Yuan Cheng, Yue Zhang, Haomin Yu, Jizhong Huang, and Hongbin Yan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-2024, 541–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-541-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-541-2024, 2024
Xin Wang, Yuan Cheng, Ruoyu Zhang, Yue Zhang, Jizhong Huang, and Hongbin Yan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-2024, 713–719, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-713-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-713-2024, 2024
Y. Cheng, J. Xue, H. Yu, and G. Hai
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W9-2024, 99–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-99-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-99-2024, 2024
S. Ge, Y. Cheng, R. Li, H. Cui, Z. Yu, T. Chang, S. Luo, Z. Li, G. Li, A. Zhao, X. Yuan, Y. Li, M. Xia, X. Wang, and G. Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 757–763, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-757-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-757-2022, 2022
A. Zhao, Y. Cheng, D. Lv, M. Xia, R. Li, L. An, S. Liu, and Y. Tian
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 805–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-805-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-805-2022, 2022
Rongxing Li, Yuan Cheng, Haotian Cui, Menglian Xia, Xiaohan Yuan, Zhen Li, Shulei Luo, and Gang Qiao
The Cryosphere, 16, 737–760, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-737-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-737-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Historical velocity maps of the Antarctic ice sheet are valuable for long-term ice flow dynamics analysis. We developed an innovative method for correcting overestimations existing in historical velocity maps. The method is validated rigorously using high-quality Landsat 8 images and then successfully applied to historical velocity maps. The historical change signatures are preserved and can be used for assessing the impact of long-term global climate changes on the ice sheet.
Rongxing Li, Hongwei Li, Tong Hao, Gang Qiao, Haotian Cui, Youquan He, Gang Hai, Huan Xie, Yuan Cheng, and Bofeng Li
The Cryosphere, 15, 3083–3099, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of an assessment of ICESat-2 surface elevations along the 520 km CHINARE route in East Antarctica. The assessment was performed based on coordinated multi-sensor observations from a global navigation satellite system, corner cube retroreflectors, retroreflective target sheets, and UAVs. The validation results demonstrate that ICESat-2 elevations are accurate to 1.5–2.5 cm and can potentially overcome the uncertainties in the estimation of mass balance in East Antarctica.
H. Cui, R. Li, H. Li, T. Hao, G. Qiao, Y. He, G. Hai, H. Xie, Y. Cheng, and B. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 443–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-443-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-443-2021, 2021
S. Luo, Y. Cheng, Z. Li, Y. Wang, K. Wang, X. Wang, G. Qiao, W. Ye, Y. Li, M. Xia, X. Yuan, Y. Tian, X. Tong, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 491–496, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-491-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-491-2021, 2021
R. Li, D. Lv, H. Xiao, S. Liu, Y. Cheng, G. Hai, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1759–1763, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1759-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1759-2019, 2019
Leilei Jiao, Yusheng Xu, Rong Huang, Zhen Ye, Sicong Liu, Shijie Liu, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 629–635, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-629-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-629-2024, 2024
Jiarui Cao, Rong Huang, Zhen Ye, Yusheng Xu, and Xiaohua Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 51–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-51-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-51-2024, 2024
Litao Dai, Xingchen Liu, Lu An, and Rongxing Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 101–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-101-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-101-2024, 2024
Penglan Luo, Gang Qiao, Zhi Qu, and Sergey Popov
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 311–318, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-311-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-311-2024, 2024
Chengjin Yan, Yuan Cheng, Yue Zhang, Haomin Yu, Jizhong Huang, and Hongbin Yan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-2024, 541–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-541-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-2024-541-2024, 2024
Yanjun Li, Violaine Coulon, Javier Blasco, Gang Qiao, Qinghua Yang, and Frank Pattyn
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2916, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We incorporate ice damage processes into an ice-sheet model and apply the new model to Thwaites Glacier. The upgraded model more accurately captures the observed ice geometry and mass balance of Thwaites Glacier over 1990–2020. Our simulations show that ice damage has a notable impact on the ice sheet evolution, ice mass loss and the resulted sea-level rise. This study highlights the necessity for incorporating ice damage into ice-sheet models.
Binbin Li, Huan Xie, Shijie Liu, Zhen Ye, Zhonghua Hong, Qihao Weng, Yuan Sun, Qi Xu, and Xiaohua Tong
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-277, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-277, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We released a dataset (IC2-GDEM) by directly refining the ASTER GDEM elevation with ICESat-2 altimeter data. It presents a superior elevation quality compared to ASTER GDEM at a global scale. It can promote seamless integration with the historical datasets of ASTER GDEM, which is essential for longitudinal studies of long-term environmental changes, etc. impacts. It can be as a new complementary data source to other DEMsfor leading to more reliable and comprehensive scientific discoveries.
Xiaofeng Wang, Lu An, Peter L. Langen, and Rongxing Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-2024, 691–696, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-691-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-691-2024, 2024
Xin Wang, Yuan Cheng, Ruoyu Zhang, Yue Zhang, Jizhong Huang, and Hongbin Yan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-2024, 713–719, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-713-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-713-2024, 2024
Zheyi Cao, Leyue Tang, Xiaohan Yuan, and Gang Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-2024, 59–64, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-59-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-59-2024, 2024
Hongwei Li, Youquan He, Yuanyuan Gu, and Gang Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-2024, 323–328, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-323-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-2024-323-2024, 2024
Y. Cheng, J. Xue, H. Yu, and G. Hai
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W9-2024, 99–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-99-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W9-2024-99-2024, 2024
S. Xu, R. Huang, Y. Xu, Z. Ye, H. Xie, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W2-2023, 771–776, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-771-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W2-2023-771-2023, 2023
Yuelong Xiao, Qunming Wang, Xiaohua Tong, and Peter M. Atkinson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3365–3386, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forest age is closely related to forest production, carbon cycles, and other ecosystem services. Existing stand age products in China derived from remote-sensing images are of a coarse spatial resolution and are not suitable for applications at the regional scale. Here, we mapped young forest ages across China at an unprecedented fine spatial resolution of 30 m. The overall accuracy (OA) of the generated map of young forest stand ages across China was 90.28 %.
H. Zhang, B. Xie, S. Liu, R. Ding, Z. Ye, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2022, 79–84, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-79-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-79-2022, 2022
Q. Xu, H. Xie, Y. Sun, X. Liu, Y. Guo, P. Huang, B. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B2-2022, 309–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-309-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-309-2022, 2022
S. Ge, Y. Cheng, R. Li, H. Cui, Z. Yu, T. Chang, S. Luo, Z. Li, G. Li, A. Zhao, X. Yuan, Y. Li, M. Xia, X. Wang, and G. Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 757–763, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-757-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-757-2022, 2022
K. Lin, G. Qiao, L. Zhang, and S. Popov
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 765–770, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-765-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-765-2022, 2022
L. Wang, G. Qiao, I. V. Florinsky, and S. Popov
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 785–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-785-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-785-2022, 2022
Z. Yu, Z. Cao, C. Yu, G. Qiao, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 799–804, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-799-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-799-2022, 2022
A. Zhao, Y. Cheng, D. Lv, M. Xia, R. Li, L. An, S. Liu, and Y. Tian
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 805–811, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-805-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-805-2022, 2022
H. Zhang, Y. Shang, X. Tong, J. Chen, W. Ma, M. Li, Y. Lu, and H. Chen
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2022, 619–625, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-619-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-619-2022, 2022
Rongxing Li, Yuan Cheng, Haotian Cui, Menglian Xia, Xiaohan Yuan, Zhen Li, Shulei Luo, and Gang Qiao
The Cryosphere, 16, 737–760, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-737-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-737-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Historical velocity maps of the Antarctic ice sheet are valuable for long-term ice flow dynamics analysis. We developed an innovative method for correcting overestimations existing in historical velocity maps. The method is validated rigorously using high-quality Landsat 8 images and then successfully applied to historical velocity maps. The historical change signatures are preserved and can be used for assessing the impact of long-term global climate changes on the ice sheet.
Lin Li, Aiguo Zhao, Tiantian Feng, Xiangbin Cui, Lu An, Ben Xu, Shinan Lang, Liwen Jing, Tong Hao, Jingxue Guo, Bo Sun, and Rongxing Li
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-332, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-332, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
No subglacial lakes have been reported in Princess Elizabeth Land (PEL), East Antarctica. In this study, thanks to a new suite of airborne geophysical observations in PEL, including RES and gravity data collected during the Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition, we detected a large subglacial lake of ~45 km in length, ~11 km in width, and ~250 m in depth. These findings will help us understand ice sheet stability in the PEL region.
Rongxing Li, Hongwei Li, Tong Hao, Gang Qiao, Haotian Cui, Youquan He, Gang Hai, Huan Xie, Yuan Cheng, and Bofeng Li
The Cryosphere, 15, 3083–3099, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3083-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of an assessment of ICESat-2 surface elevations along the 520 km CHINARE route in East Antarctica. The assessment was performed based on coordinated multi-sensor observations from a global navigation satellite system, corner cube retroreflectors, retroreflective target sheets, and UAVs. The validation results demonstrate that ICESat-2 elevations are accurate to 1.5–2.5 cm and can potentially overcome the uncertainties in the estimation of mass balance in East Antarctica.
T. Chang, J. Han, Z. Li, Y. Wen, T. Hao, P. Lu, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 437–442, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-437-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-437-2021, 2021
H. Cui, R. Li, H. Li, T. Hao, G. Qiao, Y. He, G. Hai, H. Xie, Y. Cheng, and B. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 443–448, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-443-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-443-2021, 2021
Y. He, G. Qiao, H. Li, X. Yuan, and Y. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 463–468, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-463-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-463-2021, 2021
Y. Li, G. Qiao, and X. Yuan
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 485–490, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-485-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-485-2021, 2021
S. Luo, Y. Cheng, Z. Li, Y. Wang, K. Wang, X. Wang, G. Qiao, W. Ye, Y. Li, M. Xia, X. Yuan, Y. Tian, X. Tong, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 491–496, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-491-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-491-2021, 2021
Z. Sun and G. Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 503–508, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-503-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-503-2021, 2021
D. Wang, T. Feng, T. Hao, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 521–526, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-521-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-521-2021, 2021
H. Zhao, R. Xu, and G. Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 527–532, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-527-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-527-2021, 2021
Y. Gong, H. Xie, X. Tong, Y. Jin, X. Xv, and Q. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B4-2020, 103–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-103-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2020-103-2020, 2020
X. Yuan, G. Qiao, Y. Li, H. Li, and R. Xu
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 919–923, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-919-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-919-2020, 2020
H. Zhang, S. Liu, Z. Ye, X. Tong, H. Xie, S. Zheng, and Q. Du
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2020, 149–155, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-149-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-149-2020, 2020
Z. Ye, Y. Xu, C. Wei, X. Tong, and U. Stilla
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2020, 157–163, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-157-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-157-2020, 2020
Y. Lu, J. Zhang, X. Tong, X. Lu, W. Han, H. Zhang, H. Zhao, and X. Liu
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-141-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-141-2020, 2020
Y. Wang, X. Tong, H. Xie, M. Jiang, Y. Huang, S. Liu, X. Xu, Q. Du, Q. Wang, and C. Wang
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-3-2020, 603–608, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-603-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2020-603-2020, 2020
Q. Fu, S. Liu, X. Tong, and H. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W16, 91–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W16-91-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W16-91-2019, 2019
S. Gao, Z. Ye, C. Wei, X. Liu, and X. Tong
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W7, 33–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W7-33-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W7-33-2019, 2019
Y. Lu, J. Zhang, X. Tong, W. Han, and H. Zhao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1243–1247, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1243-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1243-2019, 2019
R. Li, D. Lv, H. Xiao, S. Liu, Y. Cheng, G. Hai, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1759–1763, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1759-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1759-2019, 2019
R. Li, H. Xie, Y. Tian, W. Du, J. Chen, G. Hai, S. Zhang, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1765–1769, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1765-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1765-2019, 2019
R. G. Xu, G. Qiao, Y. J. Wu, and Y. J. Cao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1797–1801, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1797-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1797-2019, 2019
Z. Ye, Y. Xu, L. Hoegner, X. Tong, and U. Stilla
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 147–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-147-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-147-2019, 2019
X. Li, R. Li, G. Qiao, Y. Cheng, W. Ye, T. Gao, Y. Huang, Y. Tian, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 2625–2628, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-2625-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-2625-2018, 2018
Y. Tian, S. Zhang, W. Du, J. Chen, H. Xie, X. Tong, and R. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 1657–1660, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1657-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1657-2018, 2018
Wenping Song, Shijie Liu, Xiaohua Tong, Changling Niu, Zhen Ye, Han Zhang, and Yanmin Jin
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3, 193–196, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-193-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-193-2018, 2018
Xin Zhang, Shijie Liu, Haifeng Yu, Xiaohua Tong, and Guoman Huang
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-3, 267–271, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-267-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-267-2018, 2018
Y. J. Cao and G. Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1503–1507, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1503-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1503-2017, 2017
L. M. Chen, G. Qiao, and P. Lu
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1509–1512, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1509-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1509-2017, 2017
W. Du, L. Chen, H. Xie, G. Hai, S. Zhang, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1513–1516, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1513-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1513-2017, 2017
G. Hai, H. Xie, J. Chen, L. Chen, R. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1517–1520, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1517-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1517-2017, 2017
H. W. Li, G. Qiao, Y. J. Wu, Y. J. Cao, and H. Mi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1529–1533, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1529-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1529-2017, 2017
R. Li, X. Ma, Y. Cheng, W. Ye, S. Guo, G. Tang, Z. Wang, T. Gao, Y. Huang, X. Li, G. Qiao, Y. Tian, T. Feng, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1535–1539, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1535-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1535-2017, 2017
Y. J. Li and G. Qiao
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1541–1546, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1541-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1541-2017, 2017
Y. J. Wu, G. Qiao, and H. W. Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1555–1560, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1555-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1555-2017, 2017
M. Xia, G. Tang, Y. Tian, W. Ye, R. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1569–1573, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1569-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1569-2017, 2017
H. Xiao, S. Liu, R. Li, and X. Tong
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W7, 1575–1577, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1575-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-1575-2017, 2017
Rongxing Li, Haifeng Xiao, Shijie Liu, and Xiaohua Tong
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-178, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-178, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Fracturing in the RFIS was slightly increased, particularly at its front, from 2003 to 2015. They do not seem to suggest an immediate significant impact on the stability of the shelf. However, with the rapid changes and 3D measurements of Rifts 1 and 2, the most active activities occurred at the front of the FIS from 2001 to 2016. A potential upcoming major calving event in FIS is estimated to occur in 2051. The stability of the ice shelf, particularly Rifts 1 and 2, should be closely monitored.
C. Guo, X. Tong, S. Liu, S. Liu, X. Lu, P. Chen, Y. Jin, and H. Xie
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W1, 49–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-49-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-49-2017, 2017
W. Zhao, X. Tong, H. Xie, Y. Jin, S. Liu, D. Wu, X. Liu, L. Guo, and Q. Zhou
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W1, 213–218, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-213-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-213-2017, 2017
Q. Zhou, X. Tong, S. Liu, X. Lu, S. Liu, P. Chen, Y. Jin, and H. Xie
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W1, 219–224, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-219-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W1-219-2017, 2017
R. Li, W. Ye, F. Kong, G. Qiao, X. Tong, X. Ma, S. Guo, and Z. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B8, 521–524, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-521-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-521-2016, 2016
Huan Xie, Gang Hai, Lei Chen, Shijie Liu, Jun Liu, Xiaohua Tong, and Rongxing Li
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B8, 549–553, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-549-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-549-2016, 2016
W. Cao, X. H. Tong, S. C. Liu, and D. Wang
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B8, 25–31, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-25-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-25-2016, 2016
T. Feng, Z. Hong, Q. Fu, S. Ma, X. Jie, H. Wu, C. Jiang, and X. Tong
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2165–2178, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2165-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2165-2014, 2014
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org