
|
23 Aug 2017
UAV CAMERAS: OVERVIEW AND GEOMETRIC CALIBRATION BENCHMARK
M. Cramer, H.-J. Przybilla, and A. Zurhorst
Related authors
A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping
Fabio Remondino, Marc Muick, Michael Cramer, Konrad Wenzel, and Klaus Legat
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W4-2025, 115–122, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W4-2025-115-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W4-2025-115-2025, 2025
EVALUATION OF CONSUMER-GRADE AND SURVEY-GRADE UAV-LIDAR
G. Mandlburger, M. Kölle, F. Pöppl, and M. Cramer
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W3-2023, 99–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-99-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-99-2023, 2023
HYBRID GEOREFERENCING, ENHANCEMENT AND CLASSIFICATION OF ULTRA-HIGH RESOLUTION UAV LIDAR AND IMAGE POINT CLOUDS FOR MONITORING APPLICATIONS
N. Haala, M. Kölle, M. Cramer, D. Laupheimer, G. Mandlburger, and P. Glira
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 727–734, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-727-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-727-2020, 2020
ULTRA-HIGH PRECISION UAV-BASED LIDAR AND DENSE IMAGE MATCHING
M. Cramer, N. Haala, D. Laupheimer, G. Mandlburger, and P. Havel
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 115–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-115-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-115-2018, 2018
A status quo in aerial photogrammetric mapping
Fabio Remondino, Marc Muick, Michael Cramer, Konrad Wenzel, and Klaus Legat
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W4-2025, 115–122, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W4-2025-115-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W4-2025-115-2025, 2025
EVALUATION OF CONSUMER-GRADE AND SURVEY-GRADE UAV-LIDAR
G. Mandlburger, M. Kölle, F. Pöppl, and M. Cramer
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W3-2023, 99–106, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-99-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W3-2023-99-2023, 2023
INTERACTION BETWEEN DIRECT GEOREFERENCING, CONTROL POINT CONFIGURATION AND CAMERA SELF-CALIBRATION FOR RTK-BASED UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY
H.-J. Przybilla, M. Bäumker, T. Luhmann, H. Hastedt, and M. Eilers
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2020, 485–492, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-485-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2020-485-2020, 2020
HYBRID GEOREFERENCING, ENHANCEMENT AND CLASSIFICATION OF ULTRA-HIGH RESOLUTION UAV LIDAR AND IMAGE POINT CLOUDS FOR MONITORING APPLICATIONS
N. Haala, M. Kölle, M. Cramer, D. Laupheimer, G. Mandlburger, and P. Glira
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-2-2020, 727–734, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-727-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-727-2020, 2020
ULTRA-HIGH PRECISION UAV-BASED LIDAR AND DENSE IMAGE MATCHING
M. Cramer, N. Haala, D. Laupheimer, G. Mandlburger, and P. Havel
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 115–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-115-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-115-2018, 2018