- Article
(1029 KB) - Metadata XML
- June 04, 2023
- |
- Home
- |
- Sitemap
- |
- The ISPRS Foundation
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Articles | Volume XLII-3/W3
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-107-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-107-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
19 Oct 2017
UPSCALING OF SOLAR INDUCED CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE FROM LEAF TO CANOPY USING THE DART MODEL AND A REALISTIC 3D FOREST SCENE
W. Liu
LREIS, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
J. Atherton
Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
M. Mõttus
VTT Techical Research Centre of Finland, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 VTT, Finland
A. MacArthur
School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, Edinburgh. EH9 3FF, UK
H. Teemu
Finnish Geodetic Institute, Geodeetinrinne 2, P.O. Box 15, 02431 Masala, Finland
K. Maseyk
Department of Environment, Earth and Ecosystems, Faculty of Science, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
I. Robinson
Laser Spectroscopy Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK
E. Honkavaara
Finnish Geodetic Institute, Geodeetinrinne 2, P.O. Box 15, 02431 Masala, Finland
A. Porcar-Castell
Optics of Photosynthesis Laboratory, Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Related authors
No articles found.
T. Faitli, T. Hakala, H. Kaartinen, J. Hyyppä, and A. Kukko
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-1-W1-2023, 145–150, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-145-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-1-W1-2023-145-2023, 2023
J. Suomalainen, R. A. Oliveira, T. Hakala, N. Koivumäki, L. Markelin, R. Näsi, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B1-2022, 67–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-67-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B1-2022-67-2022, 2022
Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Ara Cho, Jin Ma, Aleya Kaushik, Katherine D. Haynes, Ian Baker, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Mathijs Groenink, Wouter Peters, John B. Miller, Joseph A. Berry, Jerome Ogée, Laura K. Meredith, Wu Sun, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Huilin Chen, Felix M. Spielmann, Georg Wohlfahrt, Max Berkelhammer, Mary E. Whelan, Kadmiel Maseyk, Ulli Seibt, Roisin Commane, Richard Wehr, and Maarten Krol
Biogeosciences, 18, 6547–6565, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-6547-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) can be used to estimate photosynthesis. To adopt this approach on regional and global scales, we need biosphere models that can simulate COS exchange. So far, such models have not been evaluated against observations. We evaluate the COS biosphere exchange of the SiB4 model against COS flux observations. We find that the model is capable of simulating key processes in COS biosphere exchange. Still, we give recommendations for further improvement of the model.
L. E. Christovam, M. H. Shimabukuro, M. L. B. T. Galo, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2021, 823–828, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-823-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2021-823-2021, 2021
Terhikki Manninen, Kati Anttila, Emmihenna Jääskeläinen, Aku Riihelä, Jouni Peltoniemi, Petri Räisänen, Panu Lahtinen, Niilo Siljamo, Laura Thölix, Outi Meinander, Anna Kontu, Hanne Suokanerva, Roberta Pirazzini, Juha Suomalainen, Teemu Hakala, Sanna Kaasalainen, Harri Kaartinen, Antero Kukko, Olivier Hautecoeur, and Jean-Louis Roujean
The Cryosphere, 15, 793–820, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-793-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-793-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The primary goal of this paper is to present a model of snow surface albedo (brightness) accounting for small-scale surface roughness effects. It can be combined with any volume scattering model. The results indicate that surface roughness may decrease the albedo by about 1–3 % in midwinter and even more than 10 % during the late melting season. The effect is largest for low solar zenith angle values and lower bulk snow albedo values.
G. T. Miyoshi, N. N. Imai, A. M. G. Tommaselli, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W12-2020, 49–54, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-49-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W12-2020-49-2020, 2020
E. Honkavaara, R. Näsi, R. Oliveira, N. Viljanen, J. Suomalainen, E. Khoramshahi, T. Hakala, O. Nevalainen, L. Markelin, M. Vuorinen, V. Kankaanhuhta, P. Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa, and L. Haataja
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2020, 429–434, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-429-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2020-429-2020, 2020
J. I. Peltoniemi, M. Gritsevich, J. Markkanen, T. Hakala, J. Suomalainen, N. Zubko, O. Wilkman, and K. Muinonen
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2020, 375–382, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-375-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2020-375-2020, 2020
A. M. G. Tommaselli, M. B. Campos, L. F. Castanheiro, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W18, 167–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W18-167-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W18-167-2019, 2019
A. Berveglieri, A. M. G. Tommaselli, G. Santos, L. D. Santos, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1625–1629, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1625-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1625-2019, 2019
M. Weinmann, R. Müller, R. Reulke, E. Honkavaara, D. Tuia, and S. Keller
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1825–1826, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1825-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1825-2019, 2019
G. T. Miyoshi, N. N. Imai, A. M. G. Tommaselli, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 1875–1880, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1875-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-1875-2019, 2019
R. A. Oliveira, R. Näsi, O. Niemeläinen, L. Nyholm, K. Alhonoja, J. Kaivosoja, N. Viljanen, T. Hakala, S. Nezami, L. Markelin, L. Jauhiainen, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2-W13, 489–494, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-489-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-489-2019, 2019
M. Weinmann, R. Müller, R. Reulke, E. Honkavaara, D. Tuia, and S. Keller
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., IV-2-W5, 607–608, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-607-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-607-2019, 2019
L. Markelin, J. Suomalainen, T. Hakala, R. A. Oliveira, N. Viljanen, R. Näsi, B. Scott, T. Theocharous, C. Greenwell, N. Fox, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 283–288, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-283-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-283-2018, 2018
G. T. Miyoshi, N. N. Imai, A. M. G. Tommaselli, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 301–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-301-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-301-2018, 2018
A. M. G. Tommaselli, L. D. Santos, A. Berveglieri, R. A. Oliveira, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-1, 429–436, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-429-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-429-2018, 2018
Mary E. Whelan, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Teresa E. Gimeno, Richard Wehr, Georg Wohlfahrt, Yuting Wang, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Timothy W. Hilton, Sauveur Belviso, Philippe Peylin, Róisín Commane, Wu Sun, Huilin Chen, Le Kuai, Ivan Mammarella, Kadmiel Maseyk, Max Berkelhammer, King-Fai Li, Dan Yakir, Andrew Zumkehr, Yoko Katayama, Jérôme Ogée, Felix M. Spielmann, Florian Kitz, Bharat Rastogi, Jürgen Kesselmeier, Julia Marshall, Kukka-Maaria Erkkilä, Lisa Wingate, Laura K. Meredith, Wei He, Rüdiger Bunk, Thomas Launois, Timo Vesala, Johan A. Schmidt, Cédric G. Fichot, Ulli Seibt, Scott Saleska, Eric S. Saltzman, Stephen A. Montzka, Joseph A. Berry, and J. Elliott Campbell
Biogeosciences, 15, 3625–3657, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3625-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of the trace gas carbonyl sulfide (OCS) are helpful in quantifying photosynthesis at previously unknowable temporal and spatial scales. While CO2 is both consumed and produced within ecosystems, OCS is mostly produced in the oceans or from specific industries, and destroyed in plant leaves in proportion to CO2. This review summarizes the advancements we have made in the understanding of OCS exchange and applications to vital ecosystem water and carbon cycle questions.
Wu Sun, Kadmiel Maseyk, Céline Lett, and Ulli Seibt
Biogeosciences, 15, 3277–3291, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3277-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-3277-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Carbonyl sulfide (COS) is an emerging tracer to probe land photosynthesis at canopy to global scales, but the relationship between leaf COS and CO2 fluxes needed for this application is poorly quantified. With in situ leaf fluxes of COS and CO2 measured in a freshwater marsh, we show that light and vapor deficit control the relationship between leaf COS and CO2 fluxes by regulating stomatal conductance. Our findings support the use of COS as a tracer for canopy photosynthesis.
T. Hakala, I. Pölönen, E. Honkavaara, R. Näsi, T. Hakala, and A. Lindfors
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 411–417, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-411-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-411-2018, 2018
R. A. Oliveira, E. Khoramshahi, J. Suomalainen, T. Hakala, N. Viljanen, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2, 789–795, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-789-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-789-2018, 2018
R. Näsi, N. Viljanen, R. Oliveira, J. Kaivosoja, O. Niemeläinen, T. Hakala, L. Markelin, S. Nezami, J. Suomalainen, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3, 1305–1310, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1305-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-1305-2018, 2018
Wu Sun, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Kadmiel Maseyk, Huilin Chen, Ivan Mammarella, Timo Vesala, Janne Levula, Helmi Keskinen, and Ulli Seibt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1363–1378, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1363-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Most soils consume carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO due to microbial uptake, but whether boreal forest soils act like this is uncertain. We measured growing season soil COS and CO fluxes in a Finnish pine forest. The soil behaved as a consistent and relatively invariant sink of COS and CO. Uptake rates of COS and CO decrease with soil moisture due to diffusion limitation and increase with respiration because of microbial control. Using COS to infer photosynthesis is not affected by soil COS flux.
N. Saarinen, M. Vastaranta, R. Näsi, T. Rosnell, T. Hakala, E. Honkavaara, M. A. Wulder, V. Luoma, A. M. G. Tommaselli, N. N. Imai, E. A. W. Ribeiro, R. B. Guimarães, M. Holopainen, and J. Hyyppä
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W3, 171–175, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-171-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-171-2017, 2017
A. Berveglieri, A. M. G. Tommaselli, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W3, 19–25, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-19-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-19-2017, 2017
N. N. Imai, E. A. S. Moriya, E. Honkavaara, G. T. Miyoshi, M. V. A. de Moraes, A. M. G. Tommaselli, and R. Näsi
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W3, 73–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-73-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-73-2017, 2017
L. Markelin, E. Honkavaara, R. Näsi, N. Viljanen, T. Rosnell, T. Hakala, M. Vastaranta, T. Koivisto, and M. Holopainen
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W3, 113–118, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-113-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-113-2017, 2017
R. Näsi, N. Viljanen, J. Kaivosoja, T. Hakala, M. Pandžić, L. Markelin, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-3-W3, 137–141, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-137-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W3-137-2017, 2017
Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Kadmiel Maseyk, Ulli Seibt, Wu Sun, Timo Vesala, Ivan Mammarella, Pasi Kolari, Juho Aalto, Alessandro Franchin, Roberta Vecchi, Gianluigi Valli, and Huilin Chen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11453–11465, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11453-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11453-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon cycle studies rely on the accuracy of models to estimate the amount of CO2 being taken up by vegetation. The gas carbonyl sulfide (COS) can serve as a tool to estimate the vegetative CO2 uptake by scaling the ecosystem uptake of COS to that of CO2. Here we investigate the nighttime fluxes of COS. The relationships found in this study will aid in implementing nighttime COS uptake in models, which is key to obtain accurate estimates of vegetative CO2 uptake with the use of COS.
E. Honkavaara, T. Hakala, O. Nevalainen, N. Viljanen, T. Rosnell, E. Khoramshahi, R. Näsi, R. Oliveira, and A. Tommaselli
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B7, 77–82, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-77-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B7-77-2016, 2016
A. M. G. Tommaselli, A. Berveglieri, R. A. Oliveira, L. Y. Nagai, and E. Honkavaara
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XL-3-W4, 109–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XL-3-W4-109-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XL-3-W4-109-2016, 2016
J. I. Peltoniemi, M. Gritsevich, T. Hakala, P. Dagsson-Waldhauserová, Ó. Arnalds, K. Anttila, H.-R. Hannula, N. Kivekäs, H. Lihavainen, O. Meinander, J. Svensson, A. Virkkula, and G. de Leeuw
The Cryosphere, 9, 2323–2337, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2323-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2323-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Light-absorbing impurities change the reflectance of snow in different ways. Some particles are heated by the Sun and they sink out of sight. During the process, snow may look darker than pure snow when observed by nadir, but at larger view zenith angles the snow may look as white as clean snow. Thus an observer on the ground may overestimate the albedo, while a satellite underestimates the albedo. Climate studies need to examine how the contaminants behave in snow, not only their total amounts.
A. Porcar-Castell, A. Mac Arthur, M. Rossini, L. Eklundh, J. Pacheco-Labrador, K. Anderson, M. Balzarolo, M. P. Martín, H. Jin, E. Tomelleri, S. Cerasoli, K. Sakowska, A. Hueni, T. Julitta, C. J. Nichol, and L. Vescovo
Biogeosciences, 12, 6103–6124, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6103-2015, 2015
L. Wingate, J. Ogée, E. Cremonese, G. Filippa, T. Mizunuma, M. Migliavacca, C. Moisy, M. Wilkinson, C. Moureaux, G. Wohlfahrt, A. Hammerle, L. Hörtnagl, C. Gimeno, A. Porcar-Castell, M. Galvagno, T. Nakaji, J. Morison, O. Kolle, A. Knohl, W. Kutsch, P. Kolari, E. Nikinmaa, A. Ibrom, B. Gielen, W. Eugster, M. Balzarolo, D. Papale, K. Klumpp, B. Köstner, T. Grünwald, R. Joffre, J.-M. Ourcival, M. Hellstrom, A. Lindroth, C. George, B. Longdoz, B. Genty, J. Levula, B. Heinesch, M. Sprintsin, D. Yakir, T. Manise, D. Guyon, H. Ahrends, A. Plaza-Aguilar, J. H. Guan, and J. Grace
Biogeosciences, 12, 5995–6015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5995-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5995-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
The timing of plant development stages and their response to climate and management were investigated using a network of digital cameras installed across different European ecosystems. Using the relative red, green and blue content of images we showed that the green signal could be used to estimate the length of the growing season in broadleaf forests. We also developed a model that predicted the seasonal variations of camera RGB signals and how they relate to leaf pigment content and area well.
W. Sun, K. Maseyk, C. Lett, and U. Seibt
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3055–3070, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3055-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3055-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We report a soil COS flux model that is the first to resolve both vertical transport and microbial sources and sinks in soil and litter. By evaluation with field data, we show that the model can reproduce observed daily and long-term variations of soil COS flux. We also demonstrate that diffusion is important in controlling the flux, by limiting the COS available for soil uptake when there is strong litter uptake and modulating the water content dependence of soil uptake.
S. Dengel, J. Grace, and A. MacArthur
Biogeosciences, 12, 4195–4207, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4195-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4195-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We tested the hypothesis that diffuse radiation from cloudy and overcast skies penetrates the canopy more effectively than direct radiation from clear skies. We compared the flux density and spectral properties of direct and diffuse radiation above, within and below a forest stand under sunny, cloudy and overcast conditions in a thinned Sitka spruce forest. We recorded vertical (1m resolution) and horizontal (2.5m resolution) profiles of radiation penetration at 1nm resolution.
R. Paugam, M. Wooster, J. Atherton, S. R. Freitas, M. G. Schultz, and J. W. Kaiser
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-9815-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-9815-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
The transport of Biomass Burning emissions in Chemical Transport Model rely on parametrization of plumes injection height. Using fire observation selected to ensure match-up of fire-atmosphere-plume dynamics; a popular plume rise model was improved and optimized. The resulting model shows response to the effect of atmospheric stability consistent with previous findings and is able to predict higher injection height than any other tested parametrizations, giving a closer match with observation.
The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing is a non-governmental organization devoted to the development of international cooperation for the advancement of photogrammetry and remote sensing and their applications. The Society operates without any discrimination on grounds of race, religion, nationality, or political philosophy.
Useful Links
Useful External Links
Our Contact
c/o
Leibniz University Hannover
Institute of Photogrammetry and GeoInformation
Nienburger Str. 1
D-30167 Hannover
GERMANY
Email: isprs-sg@isprs.org